From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58020) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHrTd-0005Mi-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:23:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHrTZ-0006zk-8l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:23:37 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60774) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eHrTZ-0006zL-2A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 Nov 2017 08:23:33 -0500 Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 13:23:25 +0000 From: "Daniel P. Berrange" Message-ID: <20171123132325.GO8166@redhat.com> Reply-To: "Daniel P. Berrange" References: <1dff6d6c-be83-f6e1-2b7e-82d98bdb8a63@redhat.com> <6dd7061e-2ebe-7a51-8142-f67d5d75a81a@redhat.com> <8cd1c0b3-8386-d41e-ccfb-1a2073cdf4fb@redhat.com> <16011ac4-77c4-af75-5754-5f9586d6d629@redhat.com> <20171123130908.6ab004d3.cohuck@redhat.com> <20171123133924.60e9f616.cohuck@redhat.com> <20171123125949.GN8166@redhat.com> <7f92f916-4858-15b7-89e9-bd9c1d6f1be9@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7f92f916-4858-15b7-89e9-bd9c1d6f1be9@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 3.0 ? List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Cornelia Huck , Thomas Huth , Peter Maydell , =?utf-8?Q?C=C3=A9dric?= Le Goater , QEMU Developers , David Gibson , Greg Kurz , Markus Armbruster , Eric Blake , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Mathieu-Daud=C3=A9?= , sergio.g.delreal@gmail.com, alex@alex.org.uk On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 02:08:42PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 23/11/2017 13:59, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > >> I'm not sure I like that. For me, qemu-kvm comes with the connotation > >> of "there used to be a fork of qemu for kvm usage, and we stuck with > >> the name because it is likely scattered through scripts". > > > > Yes, qemu-kvm is a historical artifact in Fedora solely because of the > > previous fork. > > In Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Arch Linux and NixOS at least. AFAICS only > Gentoo doesn't have it. > > Looks like something that upstream should provide, let's not fight > windmills. I thought that Ubuntu / Debian had /usr/bin/kvm originally instead of qemu-kvm Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|