From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Duncan Roe Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: nft.8 document use of -f option to start nft scripts Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:43:29 +1100 Message-ID: <20171124024329.GE4109@dimstar.local.net> References: <20171119095150.6697-1-duncan_roe@optusnet.com.au> <20171124023308.GD4109@dimstar.local.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: pablo@netfilter.org Return-path: Received: from mail106.syd.optusnet.com.au ([211.29.132.42]:58210 "EHLO mail106.syd.optusnet.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751622AbdKXCno (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Nov 2017 21:43:44 -0500 Received: from dimstar.local.net (c220-239-53-24.eburwd6.vic.optusnet.com.au [220.239.53.24]) by mail106.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C0673C3D13 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:43:30 +1100 (AEDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171124023308.GD4109@dimstar.local.net> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 01:33:08PM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote: ... > Is there anything wrong with this patch? Like, does it document an untinded > feature or something? ... Rats! untinded => unintended