All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] xfs: Properly retry failed dquot items in case of error during buffer writeback
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 12:55:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171128175553.GA47056@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171128143101.18861-1-cmaiolino@redhat.com>

On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Carlos Maiolino wrote:
> Once the inode item writeback errors is already fixed, it's time to fix the same
> problem in dquot code.
> 
> Although there were no reports of users hitting this bug in dquot code (at least
> none I've seen), the bug is there and I was already planning to fix it when the
> correct approach to fix the inodes part was decided.
> 
> This patch aims to fix the same problem in dquot code, regarding failed buffers
> being unable to be resubmitted once they are flush locked.
> 
> Tested with the recently test-case sent to fstests list by Hou Tao.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com>
> ---
> V2:
> 	- in xfs_dquot.c
> 	  ..Add a couple of parentheses around lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_FAILED
> 	- in xfs_dquot_item.c:
> 	  ..Add missing blank line between variable definiton and code
> 	  ..Initialize dqp pointer out of variable definition to shut up
> 	    gcc's 'unused variable' warning
> 
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c      | 11 ++++++++---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_dquot_item.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> index d57c2db64e59..b2bafa284253 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> @@ -970,14 +970,19 @@ xfs_qm_dqflush_done(
>  	 * holding the lock before removing the dquot from the AIL.
>  	 */
>  	if ((lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_IN_AIL) &&
> -	    lip->li_lsn == qip->qli_flush_lsn) {
> +	    ((lip->li_lsn == qip->qli_flush_lsn) ||
> +	     (lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_FAILED))) {
>  
>  		/* xfs_trans_ail_delete() drops the AIL lock. */
>  		spin_lock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> -		if (lip->li_lsn == qip->qli_flush_lsn)
> +		if (lip->li_lsn == qip->qli_flush_lsn) {
>  			xfs_trans_ail_delete(ailp, lip, SHUTDOWN_CORRUPT_INCORE);
> -		else
> +		} else if (lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_FAILED) {
> +			xfs_clear_li_failed(lip);
>  			spin_unlock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> +		} else {
> +			spin_unlock(&ailp->xa_lock);
> +		}

Nit, but the following looks a bit cleaner to me:

		if ((ip->li_lsn == qip->qli_flush_lsn) {
			xfs_trans_ail_delete(...);
		} else {
			/*
			 * clear the failed state since we're about to drop the
			 * flush lock
			 */
			if (lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_FAILED)
				xfs_clear_li_failed(lip);
			spin_unlock();
		}

Otherwise looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>

>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot_item.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot_item.c
> index 2c7a1629e064..664dea105e76 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot_item.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_dquot_item.c
> @@ -137,6 +137,26 @@ xfs_qm_dqunpin_wait(
>  	wait_event(dqp->q_pinwait, (atomic_read(&dqp->q_pincount) == 0));
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Callback used to mark a buffer with XFS_LI_FAILED when items in the buffer
> + * have been failed during writeback
> + *
> + * this informs the AIL that the dquot is already flush locked on the next push,
> + * and acquires a hold on the buffer to ensure that it isn't reclaimed before
> + * dirty data makes it to disk.
> + */
> +STATIC void
> +xfs_dquot_item_error(
> +	struct xfs_log_item	*lip,
> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp)
> +{
> +	struct xfs_dquot	*dqp;
> +
> +	dqp = DQUOT_ITEM(lip)->qli_dquot;
> +	ASSERT(!completion_done(&dqp->q_flush));
> +	xfs_set_li_failed(lip, bp);
> +}
> +
>  STATIC uint
>  xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_push(
>  	struct xfs_log_item	*lip,
> @@ -144,13 +164,28 @@ xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_push(
>  					      __acquires(&lip->li_ailp->xa_lock)
>  {
>  	struct xfs_dquot	*dqp = DQUOT_ITEM(lip)->qli_dquot;
> -	struct xfs_buf		*bp = NULL;
> +	struct xfs_buf		*bp = lip->li_buf;
>  	uint			rval = XFS_ITEM_SUCCESS;
>  	int			error;
>  
>  	if (atomic_read(&dqp->q_pincount) > 0)
>  		return XFS_ITEM_PINNED;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * The buffer containing this item failed to be written back
> +	 * previously. Resubmit the buffer for IO
> +	 */
> +	if (lip->li_flags & XFS_LI_FAILED) {
> +		if (!xfs_buf_trylock(bp))
> +			return XFS_ITEM_LOCKED;
> +
> +		if (!xfs_buf_resubmit_failed_buffers(bp, lip, buffer_list))
> +			rval = XFS_ITEM_FLUSHING;
> +
> +		xfs_buf_unlock(bp);
> +		return rval;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (!xfs_dqlock_nowait(dqp))
>  		return XFS_ITEM_LOCKED;
>  
> @@ -242,7 +277,8 @@ static const struct xfs_item_ops xfs_dquot_item_ops = {
>  	.iop_unlock	= xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_unlock,
>  	.iop_committed	= xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_committed,
>  	.iop_push	= xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_push,
> -	.iop_committing = xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_committing
> +	.iop_committing = xfs_qm_dquot_logitem_committing,
> +	.iop_error	= xfs_dquot_item_error
>  };
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 2.14.3
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2017-11-28 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-11-28 14:31 [PATCH V2] xfs: Properly retry failed dquot items in case of error during buffer writeback Carlos Maiolino
2017-11-28 17:55 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-11-29 12:33   ` Carlos Maiolino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171128175553.GA47056@bfoster.bfoster \
    --to=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=cmaiolino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.