From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Sakkinen Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/11] intel_sgx: driver documentation Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 22:46:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20171128204616.aqll77bnyhg3eov7@linux.intel.com> References: <20171113194528.28557-1-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20171113194528.28557-12-jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com> <20171117214310.GB25974@fury> <20171120230843.ozqhqhj5h3uuds3f@linux.intel.com> <1511802219.9392.44.camel@intel.com> <20171128203748.vnf6qxs526djghin@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:54752 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932187AbdK1UqQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:46:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171128203748.vnf6qxs526djghin@linux.intel.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Darren Hart , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:37:48PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 09:03:39AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > I have a branch based on Jarkko's patches (I believe it's up-to-date with v5) > > that implements what I described.  I'd be happy to send RFC patches if that > > would help. > > That would only slow things down. The code is easy to move around and > I'm doing infrastructure changes as part of the review process. The > latest version (v6) that I sent on Sat has struct sgx_epc_page removed > just to name an example. > > Rather than sending any deprecated patches it would be more useful to > get input (in English) on directory layout. > > I guess you missed v6 as it I had to drop the 01.org list temporarily. > It will be back in v7 as I was able to retrieve the admin password and > configure it in suitable way. Once my series has been landed, you could drop a series for review. Then it does make sense. I won't of course add any exports needed by KVM etc. I'm only doing "lowest common denominator" groundwork. /Jarkko