From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56213) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJr7p-0002FB-MX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:25:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJr7l-0003rX-NE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:25:21 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eJr7l-0003rF-FI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Nov 2017 20:25:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 09:25:12 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20171129012511.GA8889@lemon> References: <151134740734.552.186654908491769740@bafd83ae6430> <3d7b93b2-76b1-cfc4-f87b-8983a8439bb7@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3d7b93b2-76b1-cfc4-f87b-8983a8439bb7@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add a blog post about HAXM acceleration on Windows List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, no-reply@patchew.org, yu.ning@linux.intel.com, huth@tuxfamily.org, sw@weilnetz.de, yu.ning@intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, patchew-devel@freelists.org On Tue, 11/28 13:57, Eric Blake wrote: > On 11/22/2017 04:43 AM, no-reply@patchew.org wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This series failed automatic build test. Please find the testing commands and > > their output below. If you have docker installed, you can probably reproduce it > > locally. > > > > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Add a blog post about HAXM acceleration on Windows > > Type: series > > Message-id: 1511338200-20417-1-git-send-email-yu.ning@linux.intel.com > > Just now noticing this, but it's impressive that: > > > Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384 > > Switched to a new branch 'test' > > 73987e06df Add a blog post about HAXM acceleration on Windows > > the patch even applied, even though it wasn't against qemu.git! Is it > possible to teach patchew to ignore patches against the website, as that is > maintained in a separate repository? This patch was supposed to have "[qemu-web PATCH]" or "[PATCH web]" in the subject. That way it wouldn't be processed by patchew. (I think that is in general a good way to state which repo the series is targeting at.) Fam