From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] core: mount xenfs, ignore proc-xen.mount (#6442, #6662) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:54:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20171129155457.GB5299@aepfle.de> References: <20171129153842.14353-1-olaf@aepfle.de> <5A1EE45A0200007800193358@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6703735614961584935==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5A1EE45A0200007800193358@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Jan Beulich Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Vasilis Liaskovitis , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============6703735614961584935== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 29, Jan Beulich wrote: > With all of the above, was it considered to check /sys/hypervisor > alongside with or perhaps even in preference to /proc/xen? Yes. /proc/xen/capabilities is the one and only place that indicates a dom0. Olaf --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSkRyP6Rn//f03pRUBdQqD6ppg2fgUCWh7YSAAKCRBdQqD6ppg2 fgGTAKCPCXtagQupyAoabMd4dMeAJw0oewCgpiBBkR5HbA1MpOaFnyZSD2MeNRY= =0Imo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- --===============6703735614961584935== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVucHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0 cy54ZW5wcm9qZWN0Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3hlbi1kZXZlbA== --===============6703735614961584935==--