From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] core: mount xenfs, ignore proc-xen.mount (#6442, #6662) Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 13:38:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20171201133848.140d2063.olaf@aepfle.de> References: <20171129160742.GC5299@aepfle.de> <5A1EED6702000078001933EF@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20171130082355.GC3073@aepfle.de> <5A1FD0F10200007800193657@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20171201102146.m27cpsgm2jjcomgl@citrix.com> <5A214D820200007800193BFB@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20171201114829.hvmhxfbrpa24d3sq@citrix.com> <5A2155110200007800193C60@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20171201121538.75rtuwaiekhxxitd@citrix.com> <5A2157C40200007800193C90@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <20171201122924.pz7tcv3wb3fyssdr@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============7640679748664404233==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20171201122924.pz7tcv3wb3fyssdr@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Wei Liu Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Vasilis Liaskovitis , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============7640679748664404233== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/x34=MWKsa8=rTfKJHN+ApeG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --Sig_/x34=MWKsa8=rTfKJHN+ApeG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Fri, 1 Dec 2017 12:29:24 +0000 schrieb Wei Liu : > But Olaf needs to know if some of the services like xenconsoled or > xenstored should be started, and if some of the special file systems > should be mounted, right? Those aren't tied to hardware in anyway. In my > view that's the responsibility of the toolstack control domain. No, I did not intent to make use of ConditionVirtualization=3D in the xen*.service files in tools/hotplug/Linux/. That variable can not be used for this purpose, and the patch would not change that. In case you refer to the "proc-xen.mount" change from a few days/weeks ago, this was all about avoiding the error when xenfs becomes an "API filesystem= ". With this suggested change the existing "proc-xen.mount units would not fail anymore because /proc/xen is added to the ignore list. Olaf --Sig_/x34=MWKsa8=rTfKJHN+ApeG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSkRyP6Rn//f03pRUBdQqD6ppg2fgUCWiFNWAAKCRBdQqD6ppg2 fjBTAJ90qJ6l6vtwV9Qvu6irr8HMbjwJmgCggLusjARoq5E5l9NoBbLPluJBiUQ= =tC7R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/x34=MWKsa8=rTfKJHN+ApeG-- --===============7640679748664404233== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVucHJvamVjdC5vcmcKaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0 cy54ZW5wcm9qZWN0Lm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3hlbi1kZXZlbA== --===============7640679748664404233==--