From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 16:55:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171204165533.GI29619@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512404606-26498-1-git-send-email-vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 09:53:26PM +0530, Vinayak Menon wrote:
> A case is observed where a wrong physical address is read,
> resulting in a bus error and that happens soon after TTBR0 is
> set to the saved ttbr by uaccess_ttbr0_enable. This is always
> seen to happen in the exit path of the task.
>
> exception
> __arch_copy_from_user
> __copy_from_user
> probe_kernel_read
> get_freepointer_safe
> slab_alloc_node
> slab_alloc
> kmem_cache_alloc
> kmem_cache_zalloc
> fill_pool
> __debug_object_init
> debug_object_init
> rcuhead_fixup_activate
> debug_object_fixup
> debug_object_activate
> debug_rcu_head_queue
> __call_rcu
> ep_remove
> eventpoll_release_file
> __fput
> ____fput
> task_work_run
> do_exit
>
> The mm has been released and the pgd is freed, but probe_kernel_read
> invoked from slub results in call to __arch_copy_from_user. At the
> entry to __arch_copy_from_user, when SW PAN is enabled, this results
> in stale value being set to ttbr0. May be a speculative fetch aftwerwards
> is resulting in invalid physical address access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>
> I have not tested this patch to see if it fixes the problem.
> Sending it early for comments.
I wonder whether it would be better to avoid restoring the user TTBR0 if
KERNEL_DS is set. We could do the same thing for PAN. Do we ever access
user addresses under KERNEL_DS?
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 16:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 16:23 [RFC PATCH] arm64: deactivate saved ttbr when mm is deactivated Vinayak Menon
2017-12-04 16:55 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-12-04 17:30 ` Mark Rutland
2017-12-04 18:00 ` Mark Rutland
2017-12-05 5:00 ` Vinayak Menon
2017-12-05 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2017-12-05 14:55 ` Will Deacon
2017-12-05 15:56 ` Vinayak Menon
2017-12-05 16:37 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171204165533.GI29619@arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.