From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Richard W . M . Jones" <rjones@redhat.com>,
Felipe Franciosi <felipe@nutanix.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Dariusz Stojaczyk <dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] vhost-scsi: add missing virtqueue_size parameter
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 02:59:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205025804-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6ca783b-bd13-8d5e-cdec-a3d7e00d9b20@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 03:00:45PM -0500, Eric Farman wrote:
>
>
> On 12/04/2017 01:05 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 4 December 2017 at 17:52, Eric Farman <farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > On 12/01/2017 10:16 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 01/12/2017 16:15, Eric Farman wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
> > > > > index cd4ab05233..9c1bea8ff3 100644
> > > > > --- a/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
> > > > > +++ b/hw/scsi/vhost-scsi.c
> > > > > @@ -233,6 +233,8 @@ static Property vhost_scsi_properties[] = {
> > > > > DEFINE_PROP_STRING("wwpn", VirtIOSCSICommon, conf.wwpn),
> > > > > DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("boot_tpgt", VirtIOSCSICommon, conf.boot_tpgt,
> > > > > 0),
> > > > > DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num_queues", VirtIOSCSICommon, conf.num_queues,
> > > > > 1),
> > > > > + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("virtqueue_size", VirtIOSCSICommon,
> > > > > conf.virtqueue_size,
> > > > > + 128),
> > > > > DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("max_sectors", VirtIOSCSICommon,
> > > > > conf.max_sectors,
> > > > > 0xFFFF),
> > > > > DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("cmd_per_lun", VirtIOSCSICommon,
> > > > > conf.cmd_per_lun, 128),
> >
> > > Wow, super quick, thank you! Seeing conversations today, is this queued for
> > > -rc4, or 2.12 and backport to qemu-stable?
> >
> > If people can come to a consensus on whether this is -rc4 material
> > by Tuesday 12:00 GMT that would be helpful.
>
> I'd vote for -rc4, since it's a new guest crash since 2.10.
I think so too.
> But I also
> won't complain if it waits for 2.11.1 since I was out of the office during
> the whole freeze period and no one else noticed it.
>
> - Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 15:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 2.11 0/1] Fix guest boot with vhost-scsi Eric Farman
2017-12-01 15:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] vhost-scsi: add missing virtqueue_size parameter Eric Farman
2017-12-01 15:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-12-04 17:52 ` Eric Farman
2017-12-04 18:05 ` Peter Maydell
2017-12-04 20:00 ` Eric Farman
2017-12-05 0:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-12-05 12:40 ` Peter Maydell
2017-12-05 18:10 ` Eric Farman
2017-12-02 11:35 ` Richard W.M. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171205025804-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=dariuszx.stojaczyk@intel.com \
--cc=farman@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=felipe@nutanix.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.