From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:10:47 -0800
Subject: [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if
 buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail
In-Reply-To: <87a7yxmrwz.fsf@rpws.prws.suse.cz>
References: <20171201024012.wsq3xnsbbdqwxwp2@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <20171201192152.GD142348@google.com>
 <87a7yxmrwz.fsf@rpws.prws.suse.cz>
Message-ID: <20171205181047.GA66710@google.com>
List-Id: <ltp.lists.linux.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ltp@lists.linux.it

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:43:08AM +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> 
> We are getting the following result, even with the follow up patch:
> 
> keyctl06.c:68: FAIL: KEYCTL_READ returned 4 but expected 8
> 
> This is with SUSE SLE15 kernel 4.12.14. I haven't had chance to
> investigate it yet.
> 

Does the kernel include *both* fixes the test tests for now?

From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5340999070766920047=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 10:10:47 -0800
Message-ID: <20171205181047.GA66710@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <87a7yxmrwz.fsf@rpws.prws.suse.cz>
List-Id: <oe-lkp.lists.linux.dev>

--===============5340999070766920047==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:43:08AM +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> =

> We are getting the following result, even with the follow up patch:
> =

> keyctl06.c:68: FAIL: KEYCTL_READ returned 4 but expected 8
> =

> This is with SUSE SLE15 kernel 4.12.14. I haven't had chance to
> investigate it yet.
> =


Does the kernel include *both* fixes the test tests for now?

--===============5340999070766920047==--


From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752673AbdLESKy (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:10:54 -0500
Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com ([209.85.214.48]:37200 "EHLO
        mail-it0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752126AbdLESKw (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:10:52 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMY239bLXFHZ5VQcx+orB+Pt0AFTJvpmGH3h6SLc02t8zoJxTbkIZJ2cazbQWDF5MQnM+O8Vow==
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:10:47 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
To: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.de>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, lkp@01.org,
        James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, ltp@lists.linux.it
Subject: Re: [LTP] 3239b6f29b ("KEYS: return full count in keyring_read() if
 buffer is too small"): ltp.keyctl06.fail
Message-ID: <20171205181047.GA66710@google.com>
References: <20171201024012.wsq3xnsbbdqwxwp2@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <20171201192152.GD142348@google.com>
 <87a7yxmrwz.fsf@rpws.prws.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87a7yxmrwz.fsf@rpws.prws.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:43:08AM +0100, Richard Palethorpe wrote:
> 
> We are getting the following result, even with the follow up patch:
> 
> keyctl06.c:68: FAIL: KEYCTL_READ returned 4 but expected 8
> 
> This is with SUSE SLE15 kernel 4.12.14. I haven't had chance to
> investigate it yet.
> 

Does the kernel include *both* fixes the test tests for now?