From: Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>, Todd Kjos <tkjos@android.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled
Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:38:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171206113821.GO31247@e110439-lin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtCoUVoxhG5mem9fcf30VoQBUCMZr-CLkFVoKRMHr_=btQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Vincent,
On 06-Dec 10:39, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On 30 November 2017 at 12:47, Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> > static void dequeue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> > @@ -1564,6 +1564,9 @@ pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
> >
> > p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
> >
> > + /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
>
> p is null when there is no rt task to pick.
> You should test this condition before calling cpufreq_update_util
Mmm... for what I see, from the above function's implementation,
_pick_next_task_rt() is always returning a valid pointer to an RT
task.
The above call does a:
p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
right before returning, and there is also a BUG_ON(!rt_se) in the
previous RT tasks scanning loop.
Am I missing something?
> > + cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
> > +
> > /* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
> > dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
[...]
> > @@ -2317,6 +2323,9 @@ static void set_curr_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
> >
> > p->se.exec_start = rq_clock_task(rq);
> >
> > + /* Kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
> > + cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT);
>
> Is this change linked to the "- when a task is set to be RT" in the
> commit message ?
>
> I can't see a situation where this is call without the previous one.
> AFAICT, enqueue_task_rt will be called before each call to this
> function
Yeah, you right, in core.c the pattern seems to always be:
if (queued)
enqueue_task()
if (running)
set_curr_task()
I'll remove this chunk from the next version.
>
> > +
> > /* The running task is never eligible for pushing */
> > dequeue_pushable_task(rq, p);
> > }
Thanks for the review!
--
#include <best/regards.h>
Patrick Bellasi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-06 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 11:47 [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] cpufreq: schedutil: reset sg_cpus's flags at IDLE enter Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:41 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:45 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:01 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 12:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 15:55 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-12-12 11:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 13:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 14:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-12 14:56 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-12 15:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-12 15:16 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-13 9:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-20 14:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 14:51 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ensure max frequency while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:17 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:45 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:03 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-07 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:18 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq: schedutil: update CFS util only if used Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:22 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:57 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 5:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 14:19 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-14 4:45 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] sched/rt: fast switch to maximum frequency when RT tasks are scheduled Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:28 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-06 9:39 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-12-06 11:38 ` Patrick Bellasi [this message]
2017-12-06 12:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] cpufreq: schedutil: relax rate-limiting while running RT/DL tasks Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:36 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 15:54 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:06 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 11:47 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] cpufreq: schedutil: ignore sugov kthreads Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 13:41 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-11-30 16:12 ` Juri Lelli
2017-11-30 16:42 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-07 9:24 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-07 15:47 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-20 15:30 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] cpufreq: schedutil: fixes for flags updates Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 9:15 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-21 10:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-21 10:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-22 8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-20 15:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-31 9:43 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-01-02 13:31 ` Claudio Scordino
2017-12-20 17:38 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-20 18:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 10:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 11:02 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 11:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:14 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:07 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:27 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:38 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 12:43 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:50 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-22 13:01 ` Juri Lelli
2017-12-22 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-22 12:25 ` Patrick Bellasi
2017-12-21 7:34 ` Viresh Kumar
2018-02-06 10:55 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 15:43 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-06 18:14 ` Claudio Scordino
2018-02-06 18:36 ` Patrick Bellasi
2018-02-08 16:14 ` Claudio Scordino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171206113821.GO31247@e110439-lin \
--to=patrick.bellasi@arm.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tkjos@android.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.