All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20171206134702.GA12234@kernel.org>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 755e387..a034934 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ think it is warranted, thanks!
 > 
 > > > See the log:
 > > > 
-> > > root at skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 10322 -M CPI,IPC
+> > > root@skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 10322 -M CPI,IPC
 > > > ^C
 > > >   Performance counter stats for process id '10322':
 > > > 
@@ -49,14 +49,14 @@ think it is warranted, thanks!
 > > > > 
 > > > > I applied the diff but it's failed.
 > > > > 
-> > > > jinyao at skl:~/skl-ws/perf-dev/lck-4594/src$ patch -p1 < 1.pat
+> > > > jinyao@skl:~/skl-ws/perf-dev/lck-4594/src$ patch -p1 < 1.pat
 > > > > patching file tools/perf/util/pmu.c
 > > > > patch: **** malformed patch at line 41: *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
 > > > > 
 > > > > Could you send the patch as attachment to me in another mail thread?
 > > > > 
-> > > > to yao.jin at linux.intel.com
-> > > > cc yao.jin at intel.com
+> > > > to yao.jin@linux.intel.com
+> > > > cc yao.jin@intel.com
 > > > > 
 > > > > Thanks
 > > > > Jin Yao
@@ -67,11 +67,11 @@ think it is warranted, thanks!
 > > > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
 > > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c
 > > > > > @@ -538,6 +538,34 @@ static bool pmu_is_uncore(const char *name)
-> > > > >  ? }
+> > > > >    }
 > > > > > 
-> > > > >  ? /*
-> > > > > + *? PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some
-> > > > > + *? platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core
+> > > > >    /*
+> > > > > + *  PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some
+> > > > > + *  platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core
 > > > > > device.
 > > > > > + */
 > > > > > +static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)
@@ -99,16 +99,16 @@ think it is warranted, thanks!
 > > > > > +}
 > > > > > +
 > > > > > +/*
-> > > > >  ?? * Return the CPU id as a raw string.
-> > > > >  ?? *
-> > > > >  ?? * Each architecture should provide a more precise id string that
+> > > > >     * Return the CPU id as a raw string.
+> > > > >     *
+> > > > >     * Each architecture should provide a more precise id string that
 > > > > > @@ -641,7 +669,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head
 > > > > > *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)
-> > > > >  ?? break;
-> > > > >  ?? }
+> > > > >     break;
+> > > > >     }
 > > > > > 
 > > > > > - if (pmu->is_uncore) {
 > > > > > + if (!is_pmu_core(name)) {
-> > > > >  ?? /* check for uncore devices */
-> > > > >  ?? if (pe->pmu == NULL)
-> > > > >  ?? continue;
+> > > > >     /* check for uncore devices */
+> > > > >     if (pe->pmu == NULL)
+> > > > >     continue;
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 5da215b..b33caf2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -6,10 +6,27 @@
  "ref\01f79aa3c-a061-7c55-5d3e-f13638be01ad@linux.intel.com\0"
  "ref\020171205184242.GA19952@kernel.org\0"
  "ref\071db0255-af9b-968a-7baa-238d7146f069@linux.intel.com\0"
- "From\0acme@kernel.org (Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is_uncore to detect PMU UNCORE devices\0"
+ "From\0Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] perf utils: use pmu->is_uncore to detect PMU UNCORE devices\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 6 Dec 2017 10:47:02 -0300\0"
- "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0Jin"
+ " Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gklkml16@gmail.com>"
+  Ganapatrao Kulkarni <ganapatrao.kulkarni@cavium.com>
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
+  Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>
+  catalin.marinas@arm.com
+  mark.rutland@arm.com
+  Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
+  Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
+  Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
+  jnair@caviumnetworks.com
+  Zhangshaokun <zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com>
+  Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
+  Robert Richter <Robert.Richter@cavium.com>
+  Jin
+ " Yao <yao.jin@intel.com>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Em Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 08:30:37AM +0800, Jin, Yao escreveu:\n"
@@ -40,7 +57,7 @@
  "> \n"
  "> > > See the log:\n"
  "> > > \n"
- "> > > root at skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 10322 -M CPI,IPC\n"
+ "> > > root@skl:/tmp# perf stat --per-thread -p 10322 -M CPI,IPC\n"
  "> > > ^C\n"
  "> > >   Performance counter stats for process id '10322':\n"
  "> > > \n"
@@ -63,14 +80,14 @@
  "> > > > \n"
  "> > > > I applied the diff but it's failed.\n"
  "> > > > \n"
- "> > > > jinyao at skl:~/skl-ws/perf-dev/lck-4594/src$ patch -p1 < 1.pat\n"
+ "> > > > jinyao@skl:~/skl-ws/perf-dev/lck-4594/src$ patch -p1 < 1.pat\n"
  "> > > > patching file tools/perf/util/pmu.c\n"
  "> > > > patch: **** malformed patch at line 41: *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)\n"
  "> > > > \n"
  "> > > > Could you send the patch as attachment to me in another mail thread?\n"
  "> > > > \n"
- "> > > > to yao.jin at linux.intel.com\n"
- "> > > > cc yao.jin at intel.com\n"
+ "> > > > to yao.jin@linux.intel.com\n"
+ "> > > > cc yao.jin@intel.com\n"
  "> > > > \n"
  "> > > > Thanks\n"
  "> > > > Jin Yao\n"
@@ -81,11 +98,11 @@
  "> > > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/pmu.c\n"
  "> > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/pmu.c\n"
  "> > > > > @@ -538,6 +538,34 @@ static bool pmu_is_uncore(const char *name)\n"
- "> > > > >  ? }\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240 }\n"
  "> > > > > \n"
- "> > > > >  ? /*\n"
- "> > > > > + *? PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some\n"
- "> > > > > + *? platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240 /*\n"
+ "> > > > > + *\302\240 PMU CORE devices have different name other than cpu in sysfs on some\n"
+ "> > > > > + *\302\240 platforms. looking for possible sysfs files to identify as core\n"
  "> > > > > device.\n"
  "> > > > > + */\n"
  "> > > > > +static int is_pmu_core(const char *name)\n"
@@ -113,18 +130,18 @@
  "> > > > > +}\n"
  "> > > > > +\n"
  "> > > > > +/*\n"
- "> > > > >  ?? * Return the CPU id as a raw string.\n"
- "> > > > >  ?? *\n"
- "> > > > >  ?? * Each architecture should provide a more precise id string that\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 * Return the CPU id as a raw string.\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 *\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 * Each architecture should provide a more precise id string that\n"
  "> > > > > @@ -641,7 +669,7 @@ static void pmu_add_cpu_aliases(struct list_head\n"
  "> > > > > *head, struct perf_pmu *pmu)\n"
- "> > > > >  ?? break;\n"
- "> > > > >  ?? }\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 break;\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 }\n"
  "> > > > > \n"
  "> > > > > - if (pmu->is_uncore) {\n"
  "> > > > > + if (!is_pmu_core(name)) {\n"
- "> > > > >  ?? /* check for uncore devices */\n"
- "> > > > >  ?? if (pe->pmu == NULL)\n"
- > > > > >  ?? continue;
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 /* check for uncore devices */\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 if (pe->pmu == NULL)\n"
+ "> > > > >  \302\240\302\240 continue;"
 
-996d36b9c2703c5a837a59360c54afa65b211a6a6b18c22e4b800937a3e2bdae
+1fcf78920a44e9270d0b868358f298385508a3203b4f8daa82def6476b787c38

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.