From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 11:29:38 +0100 From: Henning Schild Message-ID: <20171207112938.514c41e5@md1em3qc> In-Reply-To: <20171204125358.58f923a5@md1em3qc> References: <20171201161312.4b07fac3@md1em3qc> <20171204125358.58f923a5@md1em3qc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Debian packages for Xenomai 3.x List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Cc: Xenomai List Am Mon, 4 Dec 2017 12:53:58 +0100 schrieb "[ext] Henning Schild" : > Am Mon, 4 Dec 2017 11:34:16 +0100 > schrieb Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : > > > Hi, > > > > On 01/12/17 16:13, Henning Schild wrote: > > > Am Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:27:22 +0100 > > > schrieb Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> > > >> if someone is interested I have been working a bit with the > > >> debian directory in xenomai3. > > >> > > >> I have changed the approach to the libraries. I think that now it > > >> has not sense to have a libxenomai1 so I have changed it to > > >> xenomai3-libs. > > >> > > >> The source, and the patches applied are here: > > >> > > >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/xenomai.git/ > > >> > > >> In case there's some interest, I can try to push it again to the > > >> official Debian repositories. > > > > > > Publishing them to Debian would be the ideal case. > > > > Ok, so first go for it ;-) > > Well good luck ;). Please make sure to add this list to CC. Even if > you fail the feedback might be valueable to improve what we have in > tree. > > But how about you > > > send those patches to this list? After all we have the > > > debian-subdir and people are using it! > > > > Who? I think that current debian directory doesn't work for Xenomai > > 3. Did you try? > > Yes i am using it. They might not be ideal but i also did not have any > problems with the packages. > > > I'm from the opinion that the debian directory, to generate debian > > packages doesn't belongs to upstream. But, I'm open to send any > > patch. Just I would like to know if there are some critical mass. > > We had that discussion before. I think there are quite a few people > that install xenomai with debian-packages. And as long as upstream > (Debian) does not maintain that folder, it makes some sense to keep it > in the sources. Otherwise we would need another repo just for that, > and establish a lock-step mechanism like submodules. > If we do not get upstream Debian to take care of them, i would suggest > to simplify the whole thing. i.e. maybe just throw all in one package. > > > > I am using it and i was wondering about the names, but never had a > > > big enough issue to actually review what is going on in there. > > > So please prepare a patchq and send it here. > > > > Are you using it with Xenomai3? > > Yes both on Ubuntu 16.04 as well as Debian9. Sorry you are right. My scripts actually have one line that does make a difference. And that line needs to go into debin/rules "[ ! -x configure ] && dh_autoreconf" Meaning, if you call autoreconf before dpkg-build... the debian-folder will do its job. I might send a patch, but if you are going to rework the folder that might not make any sense. Henning > Henning > > > > > Leopold > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xenomai mailing list > Xenomai@xenomai.org > https://xenomai.org/mailman/listinfo/xenomai