From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Quan Xu <quan.xu0@gmail.com>
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
P J P <ppandit@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: VMX: Use just one page for I/O permission bitmaps
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 18:06:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171207170629.GD29615@flask> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07d648fb-fa42-9e74-66cc-d371f604bf59@gmail.com>
2017-12-07 10:33+0800, Quan Xu:
>
>
> On 2017/12/07 02:19, Jim Mattson wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Quan Xu <quan.xu0@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2017/12/06 05:26, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> > > > 2017-12-01 10:21-0800, Jim Mattson:
> > > > > Since we no longer allow any I/O ports to be passed through to the guest,
> > > > > we can use the same page for I/O bitmap A and I/O bitmap B.
> > > > I think we can disable the feature and save the second page as well:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > > index e25c55ea2eb7..80859a7cdf6d 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > > @@ -3624,7 +3624,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct
> > > > vmcs_config *vmcs_conf)
> > > > #endif
> > > > CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING |
> > > > CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING |
> > > > - CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS |
> > > > + CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING |
> > > > CPU_BASED_MOV_DR_EXITING |
> > > > CPU_BASED_USE_TSC_OFFSETING |
> > > > CPU_BASED_INVLPG_EXITING |
> > > >
> > > Jim / Radim,
> > >
> > >
> > > As a logical processor uses these bitmaps if and only if the “use I/O
> > > bitmaps” control is 1.
> > >
> > > Since we drop 'CPU_BASED_USE_IOBITMAPS' in vmcs configuration.. We could
> > > also drop
> > > 'IO_BITMAP_A'/'IO_BITMAP_B'/'vmx_io_bitmap_a'/'vmx_io_bitmap_b' for a
> > > furthermore
> > > cleanup as below:
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > index 04b4dbc..3e4f760 100644
> > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > @@ -771,8 +771,6 @@ static struct pi_desc *vcpu_to_pi_desc(struct kvm_vcpu
> > > *vcpu)
> > > FIELD(HOST_FS_SELECTOR, host_fs_selector),
> > > FIELD(HOST_GS_SELECTOR, host_gs_selector),
> > > FIELD(HOST_TR_SELECTOR, host_tr_selector),
> > > - FIELD64(IO_BITMAP_A, io_bitmap_a),
> > > - FIELD64(IO_BITMAP_B, io_bitmap_b),
> > Stet.
> >
> > > FIELD64(MSR_BITMAP, msr_bitmap),
> > > FIELD64(VM_EXIT_MSR_STORE_ADDR, vm_exit_msr_store_addr),
> > > FIELD64(VM_EXIT_MSR_LOAD_ADDR, vm_exit_msr_load_addr),
> > > @@ -943,8 +941,6 @@ static bool nested_vmx_is_page_fault_vmexit(struct
> > > vmcs12 *vmcs12,
> > > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(spinlock_t, blocked_vcpu_on_cpu_lock);
> > >
> > > enum {
> > > - VMX_IO_BITMAP_A,
> > > - VMX_IO_BITMAP_B,
> > > VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY,
> > > VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LONGMODE,
> > > VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY_X2APIC_APICV,
> > > @@ -958,8 +954,6 @@ enum {
> > >
> > > static unsigned long *vmx_bitmap[VMX_BITMAP_NR];
> > >
> > > -#define vmx_io_bitmap_a (vmx_bitmap[VMX_IO_BITMAP_A])
> > > -#define vmx_io_bitmap_b (vmx_bitmap[VMX_IO_BITMAP_B])
> > > #define vmx_msr_bitmap_legacy (vmx_bitmap[VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY])
> > > #define vmx_msr_bitmap_longmode (vmx_bitmap[VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LONGMODE])
> > > #define vmx_msr_bitmap_legacy_x2apic_apicv
> > > (vmx_bitmap[VMX_MSR_BITMAP_LEGACY_X2APIC_APICV])
> > > @@ -3632,7 +3626,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config
> > > *vmcs_conf)
> > > #endif
> > > CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING |
> > > CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING |
> > > - CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS |
> > > + CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING |
> > Is it safe to assume that all CPUs (both physical and virtual)
> > currently running kvm will support this control bit?
>
> Jim, I don't see some conditions to "Use I/O bitmaps" or "Unconditional I/O
> exiting" in Intel SDM.
> and in prepare_vmcs02(),
>
> ...
> /*
> * Merging of IO bitmap not currently supported.
> * Rather, exit every time.
> */
> exec_control &= ~CPU_BASED_USE_IO_BITMAPS;
> exec_control |= CPU_BASED_UNCOND_IO_EXITING;
> ...
>
>
> So I think it is safe for cpu and vcpu.
I agree that it is safe.
>
> as sdm said, """ "Unconditional I/O exiting" -- This control determines
> whether executions of I/O
> instructions (IN, INS/INSB/INSW/INSD, OUT, and OUTS/OUTSB/OUTSW/OUTSD) cause
> VM exits.
> "Use I/O bitmaps" -- For this control, “0” means “do not use I/O bitmaps”
> and “1” means
> “use I/O bitmaps.” """"
>
> I think it is safe for all CPU, if we clear the "Use I/O bitmaps". It
> doesn't matter whether
> the "Unconditional I/O exiting" is set or clear.. Of Course both bits are
> clear, which may
> make host/guest to the incorrect field.
>
> is it? Radim, could you help me double check it?
I don't think it is correct to have neither, though, SMD describes them
as an alternative:
33.3.2.1 PIC Virtualization
If the VMM is not supporting direct access to any I/O ports from a
guest, it can set the unconditional-I/O-exiting in the VM-execution
control field instead of activating I/O bitmaps.
And a quick test shows that we get a VM entry failure if both of them
are clear, although I can't find that explicitly in SDM.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-07 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 18:21 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: VMX: remove I/O port 0x80 bypass on Intel hosts Jim Mattson
2017-12-01 18:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: VMX: Use just one page for I/O permission bitmaps Jim Mattson
2017-12-04 18:30 ` kbuild test robot
2017-12-04 18:34 ` Jim Mattson
2017-12-05 21:26 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-12-06 0:16 ` Jim Mattson
2017-12-06 11:17 ` Quan Xu
2017-12-06 18:19 ` Jim Mattson
2017-12-07 2:33 ` Quan Xu
2017-12-07 17:06 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-12-08 2:04 ` Quan Xu
2017-12-02 0:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: VMX: remove I/O port 0x80 bypass on Intel hosts Krish Sadhukhan
2017-12-04 12:44 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-04 17:10 ` Jim Mattson
2017-12-05 7:19 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-05 11:24 ` Quan Xu
2017-12-05 12:15 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-12-05 21:32 ` Radim Krčmář
2017-12-06 0:36 ` Jim Mattson
2017-12-06 1:38 ` Quan Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171207170629.GD29615@flask \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ppandit@redhat.com \
--cc=quan.xu0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.