Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] PCI: designware-ep: Fix find_first_zero_bit() usage

[Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>]

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:55:05PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:49:53PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > find_first_zero_bit()'s parameter 'size' is defined in bits,
> > not in bytes.
> > 
> > find_first_zero_bit() was called with size in bytes rather than bits,
> > which thus defined a too low upper limit, causing
> > dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu() to assign iatu index #4 to both bar 4
> > and bar 5, which made bar 5 overwrite the settings set by bar 4.
> 
> Same comments about past tense usage.
> 
> > Fix this by using bitmaps with a static upper limit (MAX_IATUS).
> 
> I think that given that we have the size from FW (num_ib/ob_windows),
> you should allocate them dynamically (sorry for asking another respin).
> 
> > 256 was chosen since according to the databook, that is the
> 
> Nit: I think "datasheet" is more appropriate than "databook" here.
> 
> > maximum number of iATUs supported by the IP.
> > 
> > Additionally, make sure that ep->num_ob_windows and ep->num_ib_windows,
> > which are obtained from device tree, are less than the maximum number of
> 
> s/less/smaller
> 
> > iATUs (MAX_IATUS).
> > 
> > Fixes: f8aed6ec624f ("PCI: dwc: designware: Add EP mode support")
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@axis.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
> >  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h    |  7 +++++--
> >  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > index d53d5f168363..8b14e7db5487 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> > @@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, enum pci_barno bar,
> >  	u32 free_win;
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> >  
> > -	free_win = find_first_zero_bit(&ep->ib_window_map,
> > -				       sizeof(ep->ib_window_map));
> > +	free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ib_window_map, ep->num_ib_windows);
> >  	if (free_win >= ep->num_ib_windows) {
> >  		dev_err(pci->dev, "no free inbound window\n");
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -85,7 +84,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_inbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, enum pci_barno bar,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	ep->bar_to_atu[bar] = free_win;
> > -	set_bit(free_win, &ep->ib_window_map);
> > +	set_bit(free_win, ep->ib_window_map);
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> > @@ -96,8 +95,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> >  	u32 free_win;
> >  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> >  
> > -	free_win = find_first_zero_bit(&ep->ob_window_map,
> > -				       sizeof(ep->ob_window_map));
> > +	free_win = find_first_zero_bit(ep->ob_window_map, ep->num_ob_windows);
> >  	if (free_win >= ep->num_ob_windows) {
> >  		dev_err(pci->dev, "no free outbound window\n");
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > @@ -106,7 +104,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_ep_outbound_atu(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, phys_addr_t phys_addr,
> >  	dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(pci, free_win, PCIE_ATU_TYPE_MEM,
> >  				  phys_addr, pci_addr, size);
> >  
> > -	set_bit(free_win, &ep->ob_window_map);
> > +	set_bit(free_win, ep->ob_window_map);
> >  	ep->outbound_addr[free_win] = phys_addr;
> >  
> >  	return 0;
> > @@ -121,7 +119,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_clear_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, enum pci_barno bar)
> >  	dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> >  
> >  	dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, atu_index, DW_PCIE_REGION_INBOUND);
> > -	clear_bit(atu_index, &ep->ib_window_map);
> > +	clear_bit(atu_index, ep->ib_window_map);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int dw_pcie_ep_set_bar(struct pci_epc *epc, enum pci_barno bar,
> > @@ -175,7 +173,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_ep_unmap_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, phys_addr_t addr)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	dw_pcie_disable_atu(pci, atu_index, DW_PCIE_REGION_OUTBOUND);
> > -	clear_bit(atu_index, &ep->ob_window_map);
> > +	clear_bit(atu_index, ep->ob_window_map);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int dw_pcie_ep_map_addr(struct pci_epc *epc, phys_addr_t addr,
> > @@ -298,12 +296,20 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> >  		dev_err(dev, "unable to read *num-ib-windows* property\n");
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> > +	if (ep->num_ib_windows > MAX_IATUS) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "invalid *num-ib-windows*\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-ob-windows", &ep->num_ob_windows);
> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		dev_err(dev, "unable to read *num-ob-windows* property\n");
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> > +	if (ep->num_ob_windows > MAX_IATUS) {
> > +		dev_err(dev, "invalid *num-ob-windows*\n");
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> >  
> >  	addr = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(phys_addr_t) * ep->num_ob_windows,
> >  			    GFP_KERNEL);
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > index e5d9d77b778e..189f45264c2a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> > @@ -113,6 +113,9 @@
> >  #define MAX_MSI_IRQS			32
> >  #define MAX_MSI_CTRLS			(MAX_MSI_IRQS / 32)
> >  
> > +/* Maximum number of inbound/outbound iATUs */
> > +#define MAX_IATUS			256
> > +
> >  struct pcie_port;
> >  struct dw_pcie;
> >  struct dw_pcie_ep;
> > @@ -192,8 +195,8 @@ struct dw_pcie_ep {
> >  	size_t			page_size;
> >  	u8			bar_to_atu[6];
> >  	phys_addr_t		*outbound_addr;
> > -	unsigned long		ib_window_map;
> > -	unsigned long		ob_window_map;
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(ib_window_map, MAX_IATUS);
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(ob_window_map, MAX_IATUS);
> 
> Only comment I have on the patch is, make the bitmap dynamic ie allocate
> them using eg:
> 
> ib_window_map = kzalloc(BITS_TO_LONG(num_ib_windows) * sizeof(long),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> it is a common pattern in the kernel. I just do not like preallocating
> static arrays if we know the real size.
> 
> It is correct to check the number of ib/ob windows parsed from DT
> against MAX_IATUS, since that's a HW limitation therefore a FW (DT)
> bug if they are exceeded.
> 
> find_first_zero_bit() should use num_ib/ob_windows as size parameter
> (ie current patch is correct).

Hi Niklas,

May I ask you please to update this series to the latest review comments
and send out a v4 so that Bjorn can pull it please ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo