From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: Brice Goglin <brice.goglin@gmail.com>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>,
Ravi V Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
Sai Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
x86 <x86@kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add missing bits in documentation
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 17:22:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211012252.GA65487@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:58:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 09/12/2017 à 01:25, Fenghua Yu a écrit :
> > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> >
> > With more flag bits in /proc/cpuinfo for RDT, it's better to classify the
> > bits for readability.
> >
> > Some previously missing bits are added as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > index 6851854..9b62738 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt
> > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> > Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@intel.com>
> >
> > This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the
> > -X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits "rdt", "cqm", "cat_l3" and "cdp_l3".
> > +X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits:
> > +RDT (Resource Director Technology) Allocation - "rdt_a"
> > +CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) - "cat_l3", "cdp_l3", "cat_l2"
>
> Why not "Code and Data Prioritization" for cdp_l3?
CDP is an extension of CAT. So I just put cdp_l3 into the CAT class.
Thanks.
-Fenghua
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-09 0:25 [PATCH] x86/intel_rdt: Classify /proc/cpuinfo flag bits and add missing bits in documentation Fenghua Yu
[not found] ` <3690e566-27df-9931-fb89-31c8e117a314@gmail.com>
2017-12-11 1:22 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211012252.GA65487@linux.intel.com \
--to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=brice.goglin@gmail.com \
--cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.