All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: "Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	"Paulo Zanoni" <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 15:18:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211151822.20953-2-matthew.auld@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171211151822.20953-1-matthew.auld@intel.com>

From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

To give upcoming SKU BIOSes more flexibility in placing the Intel
graphics stolen memory, make all variables storing the placement or size
compatible with full 64 bit range.

Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---

v2: export the stolen region as a resource
    fix u16 << 16 (Chris)
v3: actually fix u16 << 16
v4: mark intel_graphics_stolen_res as __ro_after_init (Thomas)
v5: split out the export resource (Ingo)

 arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
index 1e82f787c160..a18de5fb9e68 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static void __init intel_remapping_check(int num, int slot, int func)
 #define KB(x)	((x) * 1024UL)
 #define MB(x)	(KB (KB (x)))
 
-static size_t __init i830_tseg_size(void)
+static resource_size_t __init i830_tseg_size(void)
 {
 	u8 esmramc = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I830_ESMRAMC);
 
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static size_t __init i830_tseg_size(void)
 		return KB(512);
 }
 
-static size_t __init i845_tseg_size(void)
+static resource_size_t __init i845_tseg_size(void)
 {
 	u8 esmramc = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I845_ESMRAMC);
 	u8 tseg_size = esmramc & I845_TSEG_SIZE_MASK;
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static size_t __init i845_tseg_size(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static size_t __init i85x_tseg_size(void)
+static resource_size_t __init i85x_tseg_size(void)
 {
 	u8 esmramc = read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I85X_ESMRAMC);
 
@@ -283,12 +283,12 @@ static size_t __init i85x_tseg_size(void)
 	return MB(1);
 }
 
-static size_t __init i830_mem_size(void)
+static resource_size_t __init i830_mem_size(void)
 {
 	return read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 0, I830_DRB3) * MB(32);
 }
 
-static size_t __init i85x_mem_size(void)
+static resource_size_t __init i85x_mem_size(void)
 {
 	return read_pci_config_byte(0, 0, 1, I85X_DRB3) * MB(32);
 }
@@ -297,36 +297,36 @@ static size_t __init i85x_mem_size(void)
  * On 830/845/85x the stolen memory base isn't available in any
  * register. We need to calculate it as TOM-TSEG_SIZE-stolen_size.
  */
-static phys_addr_t __init i830_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
-					   size_t stolen_size)
+static resource_size_t __init i830_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
+					       resource_size_t stolen_size)
 {
-	return (phys_addr_t)i830_mem_size() - i830_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
+	return i830_mem_size() - i830_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
 }
 
-static phys_addr_t __init i845_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
-					   size_t stolen_size)
+static resource_size_t __init i845_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
+					       resource_size_t stolen_size)
 {
-	return (phys_addr_t)i830_mem_size() - i845_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
+	return i830_mem_size() - i845_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
 }
 
-static phys_addr_t __init i85x_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
-					   size_t stolen_size)
+static resource_size_t __init i85x_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
+					       resource_size_t stolen_size)
 {
-	return (phys_addr_t)i85x_mem_size() - i85x_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
+	return i85x_mem_size() - i85x_tseg_size() - stolen_size;
 }
 
-static phys_addr_t __init i865_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
-					   size_t stolen_size)
+static resource_size_t __init i865_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
+					       resource_size_t stolen_size)
 {
 	u16 toud = 0;
 
 	toud = read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, I865_TOUD);
 
-	return (phys_addr_t)(toud << 16) + i845_tseg_size();
+	return toud * KB(64) + i845_tseg_size();
 }
 
-static phys_addr_t __init gen3_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
-					   size_t stolen_size)
+static resource_size_t __init gen3_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
+					       resource_size_t stolen_size)
 {
 	u32 bsm;
 
@@ -337,10 +337,10 @@ static phys_addr_t __init gen3_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func,
 	 */
 	bsm = read_pci_config(num, slot, func, INTEL_BSM);
 
-	return (phys_addr_t)bsm & INTEL_BSM_MASK;
+	return bsm & INTEL_BSM_MASK;
 }
 
-static size_t __init i830_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
+static resource_size_t __init i830_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 {
 	u16 gmch_ctrl;
 	u16 gms;
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static size_t __init i830_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static size_t __init gen3_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
+static resource_size_t __init gen3_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 {
 	u16 gmch_ctrl;
 	u16 gms;
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static size_t __init gen3_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static size_t __init gen6_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
+static resource_size_t __init gen6_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 {
 	u16 gmch_ctrl;
 	u16 gms;
@@ -398,10 +398,10 @@ static size_t __init gen6_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 	gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, SNB_GMCH_CTRL);
 	gms = (gmch_ctrl >> SNB_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT) & SNB_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
 
-	return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
+	return gms * MB(32);
 }
 
-static size_t __init gen8_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
+static resource_size_t __init gen8_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 {
 	u16 gmch_ctrl;
 	u16 gms;
@@ -409,10 +409,10 @@ static size_t __init gen8_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 	gmch_ctrl = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, SNB_GMCH_CTRL);
 	gms = (gmch_ctrl >> BDW_GMCH_GMS_SHIFT) & BDW_GMCH_GMS_MASK;
 
-	return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
+	return gms * MB(32);
 }
 
-static size_t __init chv_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
+static resource_size_t __init chv_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 {
 	u16 gmch_ctrl;
 	u16 gms;
@@ -426,14 +426,14 @@ static size_t __init chv_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 	 * 0x17 to 0x1d: 4MB increments start at 36MB
 	 */
 	if (gms < 0x11)
-		return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
+		return gms * MB(32);
 	else if (gms < 0x17)
-		return (size_t)(gms - 0x11 + 2) * MB(4);
+		return (gms - 0x11 + 2) * MB(4);
 	else
-		return (size_t)(gms - 0x17 + 9) * MB(4);
+		return (gms - 0x17 + 9) * MB(4);
 }
 
-static size_t __init gen9_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
+static resource_size_t __init gen9_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 {
 	u16 gmch_ctrl;
 	u16 gms;
@@ -444,14 +444,15 @@ static size_t __init gen9_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)
 	/* 0x0  to 0xef: 32MB increments starting at 0MB */
 	/* 0xf0 to 0xfe: 4MB increments starting at 4MB */
 	if (gms < 0xf0)
-		return (size_t)gms * MB(32);
+		return gms * MB(32);
 	else
-		return (size_t)(gms - 0xf0 + 1) * MB(4);
+		return (gms - 0xf0 + 1) * MB(4);
 }
 
 struct intel_early_ops {
-	size_t (*stolen_size)(int num, int slot, int func);
-	phys_addr_t (*stolen_base)(int num, int slot, int func, size_t size);
+	resource_size_t (*stolen_size)(int num, int slot, int func);
+	resource_size_t (*stolen_base)(int num, int slot, int func,
+				       resource_size_t size);
 };
 
 static const struct intel_early_ops i830_early_ops __initconst = {
@@ -535,8 +536,8 @@ static void __init
 intel_graphics_stolen(int num, int slot, int func,
 		      const struct intel_early_ops *early_ops)
 {
-	phys_addr_t base, end;
-	size_t size;
+	resource_size_t base, size;
+	resource_size_t end;
 
 	size = early_ops->stolen_size(num, slot, func);
 	base = early_ops->stolen_base(num, slot, func, size);
-- 
2.14.3

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-11 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-11 15:18 [PATCH v8 0/9] make stolen resource centric Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2017-12-11 16:22   ` [PATCH v8 1/9] x86/early-quirks: Extend Intel graphics stolen memory placement to 64bit Ingo Molnar
2017-12-11 16:22     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 2/9] x86/early-quirks: export the stolen region as a resource Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18   ` Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:40   ` Chris Wilson
2017-12-11 16:23   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-11 16:23     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 3/9] x86/early-quirks: replace the magical increment start values Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18   ` Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 4/9] drm/i915: nuke the duplicated stolen discovery Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 5/9] drm/i915: make dsm struct resource centric Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 6/9] drm/i915: make reserved " Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 7/9] drm/i915: make mappable " Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 8/9] drm/i915: give stolen_usable_size a more suitable home Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 15:18 ` [PATCH v8 9/9] drm/i915: prefer resource_size_t for everything stolen Matthew Auld
2017-12-11 16:41 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for make stolen resource centric (rev8) Patchwork
2017-12-11 18:06 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
2017-12-12 10:43 ` [PATCH v8 0/9] make stolen resource centric Joonas Lahtinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171211151822.20953-2-matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.