From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752358AbdLLIdk (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:33:40 -0500 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:60141 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751281AbdLLIdj (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Dec 2017 03:33:39 -0500 X-ME-Sender: Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:33:43 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Kees Cook Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Alexey Dobriyan , Dmitry Vyukov , security@kernel.org, Akinobu Mita , Andrew Morton , "Eric W. Biederman" , Josh Poimboeuf , LKML , Ingo Molnar , syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com, Vegard Nossum Subject: Re: general protection fault in show_timer Message-ID: <20171212083343.GG22935@kroah.com> References: <94eb2c18a77ce8d832055f2cf263@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:58:07AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 4:57 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Nov 2017, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > > > >> [cc security@] > >> 100% oops with interrupts disabled by nobody > >> or kernel memory read > >> [nods] > >> you named the bug already > >> > >> "notify" directly comes from userspace struct sigevent::sigev_notify > >> without adult supervision. > >> > >> Reproducer is timer_create + read(/proc/self/timers) > > > > Bah. That's a really old one. > > > > Tentative fix below. That needs more though but looking at the existing > > check there is only one valid combo with SIGEV_THREAD_ID. > > > > Thanks, > > > > tglx > > > > 8<---------------- > > --- a/kernel/time/posix-timers.c > > +++ b/kernel/time/posix-timers.c > > @@ -434,6 +434,16 @@ static struct pid *good_sigevent(sigeven > > { > > struct task_struct *rtn = current->group_leader; > > > > + switch (event->sigev_notify) { > > + case SIGEV_NONE: > > + case SIGEV_SIGNAL: > > + case SIGEV_SIGNAL | SIGEV_THREAD_ID: > > + case SIGEV_THREAD: > > + break; > > + default: > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > if ((event->sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID ) && > > (!(rtn = find_task_by_vpid(event->sigev_notify_thread_id)) || > > !same_thread_group(rtn, current) || > > FWIW, this looks correct to me. Did this ever go anywhere? I don't see it in Linus's tree yet... thanks, greg k-h