All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, kernel-team@fb.com, osandov@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:01:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212170110.GE3919388@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c52269a-d5a9-d13c-bdb6-8f47cdaed982@oracle.com>

Hello, Jianchao.

On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 06:09:32PM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> > @@ -786,18 +779,6 @@ static void blk_mq_rq_timed_out(struct request *req, bool reserved)
> >  	const struct blk_mq_ops *ops = req->q->mq_ops;
> >  	enum blk_eh_timer_return ret = BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER;
> >  
> > -	/*
> > -	 * We know that complete is set at this point. If STARTED isn't set
> > -	 * anymore, then the request isn't active and the "timeout" should
> > -	 * just be ignored. This can happen due to the bitflag ordering.
> > -	 * Timeout first checks if STARTED is set, and if it is, assumes
> > -	 * the request is active. But if we race with completion, then
> > -	 * both flags will get cleared. So check here again, and ignore
> > -	 * a timeout event with a request that isn't active.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (!test_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &req->atomic_flags))
> > -		return;
> > -
> >  	if (ops->timeout)
> >  		ret = ops->timeout(req, reserved);
>
> The BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER case has not been covered here. In that case,
> the timer will be re-armed, but the gstate and aborted_gstate are
> not updated and still equal with echo other.  Consequently, when the
> request is completed later, the __blk_mq_complete_request() will be
> missed, then the request will expire again. The aborted_gstate
> should be updated in the BLK_EH_RESET_TIMER case.

You're right.  This is inherently racy tho.  Nothing prevented the
command from completing before complete was cleared.  I'll just clear
aborted_gstate which should behave the same way.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-12 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-09 19:25 [PATCHSET] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 1/6] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU Tejun Heo
2017-12-13  3:10   ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 2/6] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 10:09   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12 18:02     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 10:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12 18:03     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 11:56   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12 18:04     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 3/6] blk-mq: use blk_mq_rq_state() instead of testing REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 4/6] blk-mq: make blk_abort_request() trigger timeout path Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 5/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE usages from blk-mq Tejun Heo
2017-12-09 19:25 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 10:09   ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-12 17:01     ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2017-12-12 17:26     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-13  3:05       ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-13 16:09         ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-14  2:14           ` jianchao.wang
2017-12-12 11:17   ` Nikolay Borisov
2017-12-12 17:29     ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-11  9:27 ` [PATCHSET] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-12  9:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-12-12 16:39   ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 16:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-12-12 19:01 [PATCHSET v2] " Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 6/6] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED Tejun Heo
2017-12-12 22:20   ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-12 22:20     ` Bart Van Assche
2017-12-12 22:22     ` tj

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171212170110.GE3919388@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=osandov@fb.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.