From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 23:48:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212234856.GZ21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212120409.64b6362e@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:04:09PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
> > {
> > return mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1));
> > }
D'oh. Even simpler than that, of course -
static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
{
return mask & -mask;
}
> Very nice! The compilation-time check if the value can fit in a field
> covered by the mask (if they're both known) did help me catch bugs
> early a few times over the years, so if it could be preserved we can
> maybe even drop the FIELD_* macros and just use this approach?
Umm... Something like this, perhaps? Same bunch, plus u{16,32,64}_...
variants for host-endian. Adding sanity check on mask is also not
hard, but I don't know how useful it actually is...
diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
index 451aaa0786ae..a032de9aa03d 100644
--- a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
+++ b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
@@ -187,4 +187,36 @@ static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len)
dst[i] = be32_to_cpu(src[i]);
}
+extern void __compiletime_error("value doesn't fit into mask")
+__field_overflow(void);
+static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
+{
+ return mask & -mask;
+}
+
+#define ____MAKE_OP(type,base,to,from) \
+static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old, \
+ base val, base mask) \
+{ \
+ __##type m = to(mask); \
+ if (__builtin_constant_p(val) && \
+ (val & ~(mask/mask_to_multiplier(mask)))) \
+ __field_overflow(); \
+ return (old & ~m) | \
+ (to(val * mask_to_multiplier(mask)) & m); \
+} \
+static __always_inline base type##_get_bits(__##type v, base mask) \
+{ \
+ return (from(v) & mask)/mask_to_multiplier(mask); \
+}
+#define __MAKE_OP(size) \
+ ____MAKE_OP(le##size,u##size,cpu_to_le##size,le##size##_to_cpu) \
+ ____MAKE_OP(be##size,u##size,cpu_to_be##size,be##size##_to_cpu) \
+ ____MAKE_OP(u##size,u##size,,)
+__MAKE_OP(16)
+__MAKE_OP(32)
+__MAKE_OP(64)
+#undef __MAKE_OP
+#undef ____MAKE_OP
+
#endif /* _LINUX_BYTEORDER_GENERIC_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-12 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-10 4:53 [RFC][PATCH] apparent big-endian bugs in dwc-xlgmac Al Viro
2017-12-11 4:33 ` Jie Deng
2017-12-11 5:05 ` Al Viro
2017-12-11 5:38 ` Al Viro
2017-12-11 6:46 ` Jie Deng
2017-12-11 15:54 ` [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits() Al Viro
2017-12-12 4:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-12 6:20 ` Al Viro
2017-12-12 19:45 ` Al Viro
2017-12-12 20:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-12 23:48 ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-12-12 23:59 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 0:36 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 1:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 1:30 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 1:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 1:51 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 2:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 14:22 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 17:45 ` Al Viro
2017-12-15 2:33 ` [RFC][PATCH] Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian Al Viro
2017-12-15 5:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-15 5:34 ` Al Viro
2017-12-15 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH v2] " Al Viro
2017-12-13 19:04 ` [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits() Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-11 6:18 ` [RFC][PATCH] apparent big-endian bugs in dwc-xlgmac Jie Deng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171212234856.GZ21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=kubakici@wp.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.