From: Vadim Lomovtsev <Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
"Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@acpica.org" <devel@acpica.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vadim.lomovtsev@cavium.com" <vadim.lomovtsev@cavium.com>,
"Schmauss, Erik" <erik.schmauss@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: acpica: add acpi status check prior walking through namespace
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 01:36:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214093600.GB10734@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0iTzJ-=8SWcS6Hu1rP4d-EeOHz2yDjTPMAq8BdW8smSPg@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 05:48:49PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 3:52 PM, Vadim Lomovtsev
> <Vadim.Lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 09:52:21PM +0000, Moore, Robert wrote:
> >> Another way to look at this is that the kernel should not be calling ACPI interfaces if ACPI is disabled.
> >
> > Yes, I agree. So in this case the ltp_acpi test case has to be updated with such checking
> > before calling ACPI interfaces. However, it seems that such calls was put there intentionally,
> > without ACPI state check, as part of kernel testing strategy.
>
> Not really.
Ok, see your point.
Thank you for your time.
WBR,
Vadim
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-12 15:59 [BUG] acpica: ltp_acpi test case causes kernel crash at acpi_ns_walk_namespace Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-12 15:59 ` [PATCH] acpi: acpica: add acpi status check prior walking through namespace Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-12 21:52 ` [Devel] " Moore, Robert
2017-12-12 21:52 ` Moore, Robert
2017-12-13 14:52 ` Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-13 16:48 ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 16:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 9:36 ` Vadim Lomovtsev [this message]
2017-12-12 23:45 ` [Devel] [BUG] acpica: ltp_acpi test case causes kernel crash at acpi_ns_walk_namespace Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-12 23:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 14:55 ` Vadim Lomovtsev
2017-12-13 16:52 ` [Devel] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-13 16:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-12-14 9:34 ` Vadim Lomovtsev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171214093600.GB10734@localhost.localdomain \
--to=vadim.lomovtsev@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=erik.schmauss@intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=vadim.lomovtsev@cavium.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.