Re: [Bridge] linux bridge does not forward arp reply back packets in a vmware vm

[Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>]

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 18:29:58 +0200
Adrian P <adrian27oradea@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:37:39 +0200
> > Adrian P <adrian27oradea@gmail.com> wrote:
> >  
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I have a strange issue with a linux bridge created by
> >> openstack-neutron (pike release). This linux bridge is hosted in a
> >> vmware VM running latest CentOS 7, with a single network interface in
> >> promiscuous mode.
> >>
> >> From openstack neutron perspective, the networking setup is simple: a
> >> single flat external provider network, with a single cirros VM
> >> instance connected to it.
> >>
> >> Therefore, in the linux bridge running in the vmware host, I have 3 interfaces:
> >>
> >> # brctl show
> >> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
> >> brq025a9a94-58          8000.005056a6b378       no              ens160
> >>                                                         tap2eb4cad6-cd
> >>    <----- neutron DHCP agent tap interface
> >>                                                         tap6d31a191-9f
> >>    <----- cirros VM instance tap interface
> >>
> >> The ens160 is the "physical" CentOS 7 host interface, that is in
> >> promiscuous mode.
> >>
> >> The  tap2eb4cad6-cd tap interface is the neutron DHCP agent interface,
> >> and the tap6d31a191-9f tap interface is used by the cirros VM
> >> instance.
> >>
> >> The problem is the following:
> >>
> >> With a tcpdump, I am able to see the arp request (ARP, Request who-has
> >> 10.20.21.1 tell 10.20.21.233) going out from the cirros VM instance on
> >> tap interface tap6d31a191-9f, and well as on the bridge itself
> >> (brq025a9a94-58). However, the reply back to the arp request (Reply
> >> 10.20.21.1 is-at 00:17:08:c4:52:80) does not reach the cirros VM
> >> instance anymore. With tcpdump, I am able to see the arp reply back
> >> packets in the bridge (brq025a9a94-58), however they do not show up
> >> anymore on the cirros VM instance tap interface tap6d31a191-9f.
> >>
> >> To me it seems that for whatever reason, the bridge does not forward
> >> the arp reply back packets to the cirros VM tap interface, and I do
> >> not understand why. The strange thing is that after a while, for
> >> apparently no reason, a single arp reply back packet gets through the
> >> bridge and the tap interface, and the arp table gets updated with
> >> correct IP address in the cirros VM instance. However, if I clean up
> >> the arp table in the cirros VM instance, it takes again 10 to 15
> >> minutes of continuously sending arp requests, until a single arp reply
> >> back packets gets through.
> >>
> >> I was banging my head to the table for a few days with this issue, and
> >> finally, for apparent no reason, I manually configured the bridge max
> >> aging time to 0, to convert it in a hub, and from that moment
> >> everything started to work without any issue. Still, I do no
> >> understand why is this happening, and obviously I cannot manually set
> >> up the bridge aging time to 0 all the time in all the bridges
> >> openstack neutron creates automatically.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >>
> >> Many thanks in advance.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Adrian  
> >
> > Does each tap instance and the ens160 have a different and valid Ethernet
> > address?  Also make sure the these are in the bridge forwarding table.  
> 
> Yes, they have valid Ethernet addresses, and they do show up in the
> forwarding table twice, see below:
> 
> # ip addr
> <...>
> 2: ens160: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master
> brq025a9a94-58 state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:50:56:a6:b3:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fea6:b378/64 scope link
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 4: tap2eb4cad6-cd@if2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500
> qdisc noqueue master brq025a9a94-58 state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 8a:b2:15:4c:96:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
> 5: brq025a9a94-58: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> noqueue state UP qlen 1000
>     link/ether 00:50:56:a6:b3:78 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet 10.20.21.249/24 brd 10.20.21.255 scope global brq025a9a94-58
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>     inet6 fe80::803d:d0ff:fe2e:3ae4/64 scope link
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 6: tap6d31a191-9f: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc
> pfifo_fast master brq025a9a94-58 state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
>     link/ether fe:16:3e:9a:04:95 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
>     inet6 fe80::fc16:3eff:fe9a:495/64 scope link
>        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 
> # brctl showmacs brq025a9a94-58
> port no mac addr                is local?       ageing timer
>   1     00:50:56:a6:b3:78       yes                0.00
>   1     00:50:56:a6:b3:78       yes                0.00
>   2     8a:b2:15:4c:96:55       yes                0.00
>   2     8a:b2:15:4c:96:55       yes                0.00
>   3     fe:16:3e:9a:04:95       yes                0.00
>   3     fe:16:3e:9a:04:95       yes                0.00


Since there are multiple entries per port maybe you are also using VLANs?