diff for duplicates of <20171215193625.GA5454@linux.intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 2863c52..84f2b18 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -34,3 +34,7 @@ results in SIGBUS, or
 mean that you wouldn't need to alter mm_fault_error() et al.
 
 Do either of these sound appealing?
+_______________________________________________
+Linux-nvdimm mailing list
+Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
+https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index cd665bd..94aaeff 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,12 +3,10 @@
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 0/2] ext4: Fix ENOSPC handling for DAX faults\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:36:25 -0700\0"
  "To\0Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>\0"
- "Cc\0linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org"
-  Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
-  Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
-  Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
+ "Cc\0Ted Tso <tytso@mit.edu>"
+  linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
   linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
- " linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org\0"
+ " linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:13:50AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:\n"
@@ -46,6 +44,10 @@
  "2) Just always return (VM_FAULT_NOSPC|VM_FAULT_SIGBUS), which I think would\n"
  "mean that you wouldn't need to alter mm_fault_error() et al.\n"
  "\n"
- Do either of these sound appealing?
+ "Do either of these sound appealing?\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "Linux-nvdimm mailing list\n"
+ "Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org\n"
+ https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
 
-8658f4b278e235f0eb85da946c9073db9084d09d68e1086ab17bd997b08ec59e
+c6b896fdc626050d3a7f4ca186bff92e6084ab29997ce46cddaaec4a83164201
