From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id EF5B8E00D17; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:25 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [198.47.19.16 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from fllnx209.ext.ti.com (fllnx209.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.16]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C756E00B48 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:00:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from dflxv15.itg.ti.com ([128.247.5.124]) by fllnx209.ext.ti.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTP id vBFMxp1W006247; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:59:51 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1513378791; bh=CrDTOIGvdf8xRjIaj9zotqN3D1VDboKS+KH8T88qAlQ=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=o7nrk/WE0WN/pYqUk4z84CSv7zCo9YTtgvpT1IxyySCPQXZ6iSXHhj1dzEjGMEZ4R B1nr78qRWuL+swzAmFp5gwldw9CutM1KonpmRxVTAuJQ66cuXq2b8s41v6XMoCb+f1 0gFLZjvPcy2uGsuBOIfr2uP9CoaatPj2/gRpCk5U= Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (dfle111.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.32]) by dflxv15.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vBFMxkc2030494; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:59:46 -0600 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1261.35; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:59:46 -0600 Received: from dlep32.itg.ti.com (157.170.170.100) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1261.35 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:59:46 -0600 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dlep32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id vBFMxkTK000627; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 16:59:46 -0600 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 17:59:46 -0500 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Joshua Watt Message-ID: <20171215225945.GD361@edge> References: <20171128195856.28289-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com> <20171211222857.17997-1-JPEWhacker@gmail.com> <20171211223916.GB27197@edge> <1513039988.18435.4.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1513039988.18435.4.camel@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org, "Mertz, Timothy" Subject: Re: [morty][PATCH v2] Make ti-xdctools a native recipe X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 23:00:26 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 06:53:08PM -0600, Joshua Watt wrote: > On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 17:39 -0500, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > > Thanks! Can you please detail the changes between v1 and v2 of the > > patch? We > > are still investigating v1 of the patch and how it affects our > > releases... > > Sorry, just rebased and took the opertunity to add the branch specifier > (morty) to the patch subject since I forgot it the first time. There > are no functional changes. Thanks, have you tried building anything with this change? Right off the bat it breaks ipumm-fw, as it expects xdctools to reside in the same sysroot as BIOS, which is the target one. Fixing it. Also, I'm making corresponding changes in meta-arago, which uses xdctools as well. Hopefully there's not much breakage there... -- Denys