All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@broadcom.com,
	bjorn.topel@intel.com, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 01/14] xdp: base API for new XDP rx-queue info concept
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:52:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171218165227.4ec6f6f2@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2effe097-6802-2020-075d-47cc3576f78f@gmail.com>

On Mon, 18 Dec 2017 06:23:40 -0700
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 12/18/17 3:55 AM, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > 
> > Handling return-errors in the drivers complicated the driver code, as it
> > involves unraveling and deallocating other RX-rings etc (that were
> > already allocated) if the reg fails. (Also notice next patch will allow
> > dev == NULL, if right ptype is set).
> > 
> > I'm not completely rejecting you idea, as this is a good optimization
> > trick, which is to move validation checks to setup-time, thus allowing
> > less validation checks at runtime.  I sort-of actually already did
> > this, as I allow bpf to deref dev without NULL check.  I would argue
> > this is good enough, as we will crash in a predictable way, as above
> > WARN will point to which driver violated the API.
> > 
> > If people think it is valuable I can change this API to return an err?  
> 
> Saeed's suggested API in a comment on patch 12 also removes most of the
> WARN_ONs as it sets the device and index:
> 
> xdp_rxq_info_reg(netdev, rxq_index)
> {
>     rxqueue = netdev->_rx + rxq_index;
>     xdp_rxq = rxqueue.xdp_rxq;
>         xdp_rxq_info_init(xdp_rxq);
>     xdp_rxq.dev = netdev;
>     xdp_rxq.queue_index = rxq_index;
> }
> 
> xdp_rxq_info_unreg(netdev, rxq_index)
> {
> ...
> }

No, we still need the other WARN_ON's.

I don't understand why you think above API is better.  In case
netdev==NULL the system will simply crash on deref of netdev.  That
case happened for both drivers i40e and mlx5, when I was adding this.
The WARN_ON help me quickly identify the issue, and in both drivers it
was a non-critical error, as these queues are not used by XDP. IHMO a
better experience for the driver developer.

IHMO WARN_ON's are a good thing.  For example the:

 if (xdp_rxq->reg_state == REG_STATE_REGISTERED)
   WARN(1, "Missing unregister, handled but fix driver\n");

Just helped me identify a bug in i40e driver.  It turns out that
changing the RX-ring queue size via ethtool <-G|--set-ring> (_not_ the
number of RX-rings, but frames per RX-ring). Then i40e_set_ringparam()
allocates some temp RX-rings and copy-around struct contents, causing
this strange issue.  It will not crash with our currently simple content,
but later this would cause a hard-to-debug issue.  I'm happy I could
catch this now, instead of later as a strange crash.

The WARN's are there to assist driver developers when using this API
in their drivers (better than crash/BUG_ON as they don't have to dig-up
their serial cable console).  For me it is also part of the
documentation, as it document the API assumptions/assertions together
with a small text field.

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-13 11:19 [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 00/14] xdp: new XDP rx-queue info concept Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 01/14] xdp: base API for " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-14  2:34   ` David Ahern
2017-12-18 10:55     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-18 13:23       ` David Ahern
2017-12-18 15:52         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2017-12-21 16:59       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 02/14] xdp/mlx5: setup xdp_rxq_info and extend with qtype Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 12:27   ` Tariq Toukan
2017-12-13 13:44     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 23:03       ` Saeed Mahameed
2017-12-14  6:46         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 03/14] i40e: setup xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-18 10:52   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " =?unknown-8bit?q?Bj=C3=B6rn_T=C3=B6pel?=
2017-12-18 10:52     ` Björn Töpel
2017-12-18 13:05     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-18 13:05       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [Intel-wired-lan] [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 04/14] ixgbe: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 05/14] xdp/qede: setup xdp_rxq_info and intro xdp_rxq_info_is_reg Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 06/14] mlx4: setup xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 12:42   ` Tariq Toukan
2017-12-13 14:00     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:19 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 07/14] bnxt_en: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 08/14] nfp: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-14  2:34   ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-18 20:25     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 09/14] thunderx: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 10/14] tun: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-20  7:48   ` Jason Wang
2017-12-21 15:42     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 11/14] virtio_net: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 12/14] xdp: generic XDP handling of xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 22:50   ` Saeed Mahameed
2017-12-18  9:47     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 13/14] bpf: finally expose xdp_rxq_info to XDP bpf-programs Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2017-12-13 11:20 ` [bpf-next V1-RFC PATCH 14/14] samples/bpf: program demonstrating access to xdp_rxq_info Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171218165227.4ec6f6f2@redhat.com \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=borkmann@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=gospo@broadcom.com \
    --cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.