From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>,
julia.lawall@lip6.fr
Subject: [PATCH v1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Revert "Make 'bt_sfi_data' const"
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 12:08:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171228100801.67744-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> (raw)
The annoying static analyzer follow up patches make a pain rather then
fixing issues.
The one done by commit 276c87054751
("x86/platform/intel-mid: Make 'bt_sfi_data' const")
made an obvious regression [BugLink] since the struct bt_sfi_data used
as a temporary container for important data that is used to fill
'parent' and 'name' fields in struct platform_device_info.
That's why revert the commit which had been apparently done w/o reading
the code.
BugLink: https://github.com/andy-shev/linux/issues/20
Cc: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com>
Cc: julia.lawall@lip6.fr
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c
index dc036e511f48..5a0483e7bf66 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_bt.c
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ static int __init tng_bt_sfi_setup(struct bt_sfi_data *ddata)
return 0;
}
-static const struct bt_sfi_data tng_bt_sfi_data __initdata = {
+static struct bt_sfi_data tng_bt_sfi_data __initdata = {
.setup = tng_bt_sfi_setup,
};
--
2.15.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-12-28 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-28 10:08 Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2017-12-28 10:28 ` [PATCH v1] x86/platform/intel-mid: Revert "Make 'bt_sfi_data' const" Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 10:34 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 11:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 11:23 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 11:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 12:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-28 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 12:25 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 12:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 12:37 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 12:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 14:00 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 15:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-28 15:28 ` Julia Lawall
2017-12-28 21:22 ` Julia Lawall
2018-01-01 15:15 ` Julia Lawall
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171228100801.67744-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bhumirks@gmail.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.