From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pipeline: add statistics for librte_pipeline ports and tables
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 16:44:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2017641.P0ts6fjbPO@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D891263236A65D@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Please Cristian, do not top post.
I'm replacing your comment in the right context.
2015-05-20 13:57, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Thanks for the detailed explanation.
> >
> > You are raising a trade-off problem about
> > feature/maintenance/performance.
> > I think we must choose among 4 solutions:
> > 1/ always enabled
> > 2/ build-time log level
> > 3/ run-time option
> > 4/ build-time option
> >
> > It's good to have this discussion and let other contributors giving their
> > opinion.
> >
> > 2015-05-19 22:41, Dumitrescu, Cristian:
> > > 1. What is the technical solution to avoid performance loss due to stats
> > > support?
> > > Generally, I would agree with you that config options should be avoided,
> > > especially those that alter the API (function prototypes, data structure
> > > layouts, etc). Please note this is not the case for any of our patches,
> > > as only the stats collection is enabled/disabled, while the data
> > > structures and functions are not changed by the build time option.
> > >
> > > But what can you do for statistics? We all know that collecting the stats
> > > sucks up CPU cycles, especially due to memory accesses, so stats always
> > > have a run-time cost. Traditionally, stats are typically enabled for
> > > debugging purposes and then turned off for the release version when
> > > performance is required. How can this be done if build time flags are not
> > > used?
> >
> > Statistics in drivers are always enabled (first solution).
> > If those statistics are only used for debugging, why not using the build-time
> > option CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL? (second solution)
>
> Can you please describe what solution 2 on your list (build-time log
> level) consists of?
>
> I see log level useful for printing messages when an event takes place,
> but this is not what these stats patches are about. We want to poll
> for those counters on demand: if the build-time flag is off, then the
> value of those counters is 0; when the build-time is on, then the stats
> counters have the real value. Basically, the build-time flag only
> enables/disables the update of the counters at run-time, which is where
> CPU cycles are consumed. I am not sure how the log levels can help here?
I think that counting stats is a kind of logging.
Some stats are always counted (see drivers) and you want to use these ones
only for debugging (after rebuilding DPDK with some debug options).
So I suggest, as second solution, to check CONFIG_RTE_LOG_LEVEL is at debug
level instead of having one option per module.
It would be implemented with "#if RTE_LOG_LEVEL == RTE_LOG_DEBUG" in
RTE_PIPELINE_STATS_ADD.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-20 14:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-30 12:15 [PATCH v2] pipeline: add statistics for librte_pipeline ports and tables Michal Jastrzebski
[not found] ` <1430396143-10936-1-git-send-email-michalx.k.jastrzebski-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-05 15:11 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-18 11:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-19 22:41 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 0:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 13:57 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 14:44 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2015-05-20 17:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-05-20 22:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-20 23:56 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-20 23:41 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-21 7:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-05-21 13:33 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-21 14:59 ` Jay Rolette
2015-05-21 16:15 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2015-05-25 10:48 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2017641.P0ts6fjbPO@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.