From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: "Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter@gmail.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)" <hpeter+linux_kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 3/4] usb: serial: f81534: add output pin control
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 10:27:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180102092745.GG16993@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c933430c-1ea8-5dae-fe75-a0acc4592aae@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 11:24:26AM +0800, Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong) wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> >> In this code, I'm only read/write 3 registers of 0x2ae8, 0x2a90, 0x2a80,
> >> but some register will read/write more than once. Should I change the
> >> code from port_probe() to attach() and re-write it as:
> >> 1: read the 3 register
> >> 2: change them will 12 pin desire value
> >> 3: write it back
> >> Is it ok?
> >
> > Do you expect these pins to ever be changed after probe? If not, then
> > perhaps it can be moved to attach(), but otherwise I guess they should
> > be set at port_probe(). By using shadow registers, you should be able to
> > reduce the number of device accesses, but perhaps it's not worth the
> > complexity.
> >
> > Do you have a rough idea about how long these register updates take? I
> > was just worried that these changes will add up to really long probe
> > times.
> >
>
> I had measured the time of the loop in f81534_set_port_output_pin() via
> getnstimeofday() with 685.410 ~ 3681.682us per port, but normally with
> 600~800us per port. So I prefer remain the current method of
> f81534_set_port_output_pin(). Is it ok?
That should be fine. Thanks for verifying.
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-02 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-16 7:46 [PATCH V1 1/4] usb: serial: f81534: add high baud rate support Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
2017-11-16 7:46 ` [PATCH V1 2/4] usb: serial: f81534: add auto RTS direction support Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
2017-12-18 15:18 ` Johan Hovold
2017-11-16 7:46 ` [PATCH V1 3/4] usb: serial: f81534: add output pin control Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
2017-12-18 16:06 ` Johan Hovold
2017-12-21 9:49 ` Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
2017-12-27 10:30 ` Johan Hovold
2018-01-02 3:24 ` Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
2018-01-02 9:27 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2017-11-16 7:46 ` [PATCH V1 4/4] usb: serial: f81534: add H/W disable port support Ji-Ze Hong (Peter Hong)
2017-12-18 16:15 ` Johan Hovold
2017-12-18 15:14 ` [PATCH V1 1/4] usb: serial: f81534: add high baud rate support Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180102092745.GG16993@localhost \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpeter+linux_kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=hpeter@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.