All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20180102202454.GQ7829@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 09ad4fd..34a43ed 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -7,22 +7,22 @@ On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:17:35PM -0800, Rao Shoaib wrote:
 > >>rcutiny.h:
 > >>
 > >>static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
-> >>                   void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
+> >>                   void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
 > >>{
-> >>     call_rcu(head, func);
+> >>     call_rcu(head, func);
 > >>}
 > >>
 > >>tree.c:
 > >>
 > >>void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,
-> >>             void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
+> >>             void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))
 > >>{
-> >>     __call_rcu(head, func, rcu_state_p, -1, 1);
+> >>     __call_rcu(head, func, rcu_state_p, -1, 1);
 > >>}
 > >>EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu);
 > >>
 > >>If we want the code to be exactly same I can create a lazy version
-> >>for tiny as well. However,  I don not know where to move
+> >>for tiny as well. However,  I don not know where to move
 > >>kfree_call_rcu() from it's current home in rcutiny.h though. Any
 > >>thoughts ?
 > >I might be missing something subtle here, but in case I am not, my
@@ -55,9 +55,3 @@ Hello, Rao,
 Perhaps it would be best if you simply reposted the latest patch.  ;-)
 
 							Thanx, Paul
-
---
-To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
-the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
-see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
-Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 5b016a6..9cba41c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -22,22 +22,22 @@
  "> >>rcutiny.h:\n"
  "> >>\n"
  "> >>static inline void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,\n"
- "> >>                   void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))\n"
+ "> >> \302\240\302\240\302\240 \302\240\302\240\302\240 \302\240\302\240\302\240 \302\240\302\240\302\240 \302\240 void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))\n"
  "> >>{\n"
- "> >>     call_rcu(head, func);\n"
+ "> >> \302\240\302\240\302\240 call_rcu(head, func);\n"
  "> >>}\n"
  "> >>\n"
  "> >>tree.c:\n"
  "> >>\n"
  "> >>void kfree_call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head,\n"
- "> >>             void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))\n"
+ "> >> \302\240\302\240\302\240 \302\240\302\240\302\240 \302\240\302\240\302\240 void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu))\n"
  "> >>{\n"
- "> >>     __call_rcu(head, func, rcu_state_p, -1, 1);\n"
+ "> >> \302\240\302\240\302\240 __call_rcu(head, func, rcu_state_p, -1, 1);\n"
  "> >>}\n"
  "> >>EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kfree_call_rcu);\n"
  "> >>\n"
  "> >>If we want the code to be exactly same I can create a lazy version\n"
- "> >>for tiny as well. However,  I don not know where to move\n"
+ "> >>for tiny as well. However,\302\240 I don not know where to move\n"
  "> >>kfree_call_rcu() from it's current home in rcutiny.h though. Any\n"
  "> >>thoughts ?\n"
  "> >I might be missing something subtle here, but in case I am not, my\n"
@@ -69,12 +69,6 @@
  "\n"
  "Perhaps it would be best if you simply reposted the latest patch.  ;-)\n"
  "\n"
- "\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThanx, Paul\n"
- "\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n"
- "the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,\n"
- "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n"
- "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>"
+ "\t\t\t\t\t\t\tThanx, Paul"
 
-b5560e1c26283ec60fe2056fccfbed1e2d3927ab73bbcf74fc4d5187ad3af324
+13c8b4fd182899a4e651378334cda5b0aeafc03ef8bbfd8c176cc0240cecf29b

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.