From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jgg@ziepe.ca (Jason Gunthorpe) Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:47:55 -0700 Subject: [v3,1/9] RDMA/core: Add implicit per-device completion queue pools In-Reply-To: <20171211235044.GA32331@ziepe.ca> References: <20171108095742.25365-2-sagi@grimberg.me> <20171211235044.GA32331@ziepe.ca> Message-ID: <20180103174755.GH11348@ziepe.ca> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017@04:50:44PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017@11:57:34AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > Allow a ULP to ask the core to implicitly assign a completion > > queue to a queue-pair based on a least-used search on a per-device > > cq pools. The device CQ pools grow in a lazy fashion with every > > QP creation. > > > > In addition, expose an affinity hint for a queue pair creation. > > If passed, the core will attempt to attach a CQ with a completion > > vector that is directed to the cpu core as the affinity hint > > provided. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg > > Sagi, Bart, > > Did we reach a conclusion on this? Is v3 the series to take, and > should it all go through the RDMA tree? It looks like there are some > missing acks for that?? > > I think there was also an unapplied comment from bart in the > patchworks notes... > > Could you please add some commit messages when you resend it? Not sure > I should be accepting such large commits with empty messages??? Hearing nothing, I've dropped this series off patchworks. Please resend it when you are ready. Jason From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: Re: [v3,1/9] RDMA/core: Add implicit per-device completion queue pools Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:47:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20180103174755.GH11348@ziepe.ca> References: <20171108095742.25365-2-sagi@grimberg.me> <20171211235044.GA32331@ziepe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171211235044.GA32331-uk2M96/98Pc@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Sagi Grimberg , Bart Van Assche Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-nvme-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Christoph Hellwig , Max Gurtuvoy List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 04:50:44PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:57:34AM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > > Allow a ULP to ask the core to implicitly assign a completion > > queue to a queue-pair based on a least-used search on a per-device > > cq pools. The device CQ pools grow in a lazy fashion with every > > QP creation. > > > > In addition, expose an affinity hint for a queue pair creation. > > If passed, the core will attempt to attach a CQ with a completion > > vector that is directed to the cpu core as the affinity hint > > provided. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg > > Sagi, Bart, > > Did we reach a conclusion on this? Is v3 the series to take, and > should it all go through the RDMA tree? It looks like there are some > missing acks for that?? > > I think there was also an unapplied comment from bart in the > patchworks notes... > > Could you please add some commit messages when you resend it? Not sure > I should be accepting such large commits with empty messages??? Hearing nothing, I've dropped this series off patchworks. Please resend it when you are ready. Jason -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html