From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf test BPF failing on 4.15.0-rc6
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:33:07 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180103183307.GC13097@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180103182701.GB13097@kernel.org>
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:27:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Continuing investigation...
>
> After applying the fallback patch to allow new tools to work with older
> kernels:
>
> [root@felicio ~]# perf test bpf
> 39: BPF filter :
> 39.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
> 39.2: BPF pinning : Ok
> 39.3: BPF prologue generation : Ok
> 39.4: BPF relocation checker : Ok
> [root@felicio ~]# uname -a
> Linux felicio.ghostprotocols.net 4.13.0-rc7+ #1 SMP Mon Sep 11 13:56:18 -03 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> [root@felicio ~]# rpm -q glibc
> glibc-2.17-157.el7_3.2.x86_64
> [root@felicio ~]#
>
> After applying the patch below I get to, which is what I am trying to
> fix now:
>
> [root@jouet ~]# perf test bpf
> 39: BPF filter :
> 39.1: Basic BPF filtering : Ok
> 39.2: BPF pinning : Ok
> 39.3: BPF prologue generation : FAILED!
> 39.4: BPF relocation checker : Skip
> [root@jouet ~]#
Update the patch to the one at the end of this message to make it work
with older glibcs, so that we ask for epoll_pwait() and hook into that
as well().
Now checking why 39.3 fails...
- Arnaldo
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
index 268e5f8e4aa2..d1e67e271675 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf-script-example.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct bpf_map_def SEC("maps") flip_table = {
.max_entries = 1,
};
-SEC("func=SyS_epoll_wait")
+SEC("func=SyS_epoll_pwait")
int bpf_func__SyS_epoll_wait(void *ctx)
{
int ind =0;
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
index 0512f1b5bfdb..7c04e2d5b60b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ static int epoll_wait_loop(void)
/* Should fail NR_ITERS times */
for (i = 0; i < NR_ITERS; i++)
- epoll_wait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0);
+ epoll_pwait(-(i + 1), NULL, 0, 0, NULL);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-03 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-02 18:59 perf test BPF failing on 4.15.0-rc6 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-03 4:42 ` Wangnan (F)
2018-01-03 4:58 ` Wangnan (F)
2018-01-03 16:58 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-03 18:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-03 18:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2018-01-03 20:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-01-04 1:37 ` Wangnan (F)
2018-01-04 15:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180103183307.GC13097@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.