* [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations
@ 2018-01-03 14:41 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-03 22:26 ` Duncan Roe
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2018-01-03 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 3000 -j DROP
shows:
nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 3s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes burst 6 packets} counter drop
which prints burst twice, this is not correct.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c | 8 +++++---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
index 472d8e7f6cc2..3fa5719127db 100644
--- a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
+++ b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
@@ -1350,10 +1350,12 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_xlate(struct xt_xlate *xl, const char *name,
if (cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTES)
print_bytes_rate_xlate(xl, cfg);
- else
+ else {
print_packets_rate_xlate(xl, cfg->avg, revision);
- if (cfg->burst != 5)
- xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
+ if (cfg->burst != XT_HASHLIMIT_BURST)
+ xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
+
+ }
xt_xlate_add(xl, "}");
return ret;
--
2.11.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations
2018-01-03 14:41 [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2018-01-03 22:26 ` Duncan Roe
2018-01-03 22:59 ` And another thing Duncan Roe
2018-01-04 9:53 ` [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Duncan Roe @ 2018-01-03 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 3000 -j DROP
>
> shows:
>
> nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 3s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes burst 6 packets} counter drop
>
> which prints burst twice, this is not correct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> ---
> extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> index 472d8e7f6cc2..3fa5719127db 100644
> --- a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> +++ b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> @@ -1350,10 +1350,12 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_xlate(struct xt_xlate *xl, const char *name,
>
> if (cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTES)
> print_bytes_rate_xlate(xl, cfg);
> - else
> + else {
> print_packets_rate_xlate(xl, cfg->avg, revision);
> - if (cfg->burst != 5)
> - xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
> + if (cfg->burst != XT_HASHLIMIT_BURST)
> + xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
> +
> + }
> xt_xlate_add(xl, "}");
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
This still discards a timeout of 1s (1000ms):
> $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 1000 -j DROP
> nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes} counter drop
This is especially incorrect, since the code deliberately inserts a default
timeout of 1m if no timeout was specified with a burst:
> $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 -j DROP
> nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 60s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes} counter drop
The patch I suggested doesn't have that problem, because of forcing defaults to
zero. Can doing that have any adverse side-effects?
Cheers ... Duncan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* And another thing
2018-01-03 22:26 ` Duncan Roe
@ 2018-01-03 22:59 ` Duncan Roe
2018-01-04 9:53 ` [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations Pablo Neira Ayuso
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Duncan Roe @ 2018-01-03 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:26:40AM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 3000 -j DROP
> >
> > shows:
> >
> > nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 3s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes burst 6 packets} counter drop
> >
> > which prints burst twice, this is not correct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > ---
Not actually related to the patch, but I happened to notice:
> 769 if (info->cfg.mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTES) {
> 770 uint32_t burst = 0;
> 771 if (cb->xflags & F_BURST) {
> 772 if (info->cfg.burst < cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg))
> 773 xtables_error(PARAMETER_PROBLEM,
> 774 "burst cannot be smaller than %lub", cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg));
> 775
> 776 burst = info->cfg.burst;
> 777 burst /= cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg);
> 778 if (info->cfg.burst % cost_to_bytes(info->cfg.avg))
> 779 burst++;
> 780 if (!(cb->xflags & F_HTABLE_EXPIRE))
> 781 info->cfg.expire = XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTE_EXPIRE_BURST * 1000;
> 782 }
> 783 info->cfg.burst = burst;
> 784 } else if (info->cfg.burst > XT_HASHLIMIT_BURST_MAX)
> 785 burst_error();
What is that final "else" claues there for? No hashlimit was specified so why
check its value?
Cheers ... Duncan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations
2018-01-03 22:26 ` Duncan Roe
2018-01-03 22:59 ` And another thing Duncan Roe
@ 2018-01-04 9:53 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-04 10:56 ` Duncan Roe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2018-01-04 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:26:40AM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 3000 -j DROP
> >
> > shows:
> >
> > nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 3s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes burst 6 packets} counter drop
> >
> > which prints burst twice, this is not correct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > ---
> > extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c | 8 +++++---
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> > index 472d8e7f6cc2..3fa5719127db 100644
> > --- a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> > +++ b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> > @@ -1350,10 +1350,12 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_xlate(struct xt_xlate *xl, const char *name,
> >
> > if (cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTES)
> > print_bytes_rate_xlate(xl, cfg);
> > - else
> > + else {
> > print_packets_rate_xlate(xl, cfg->avg, revision);
> > - if (cfg->burst != 5)
> > - xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
> > + if (cfg->burst != XT_HASHLIMIT_BURST)
> > + xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
> > +
> > + }
> > xt_xlate_add(xl, "}");
> >
> > return ret;
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
> This still discards a timeout of 1s (1000ms):
>
> > $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 1000 -j DROP
> > nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes} counter drop
>
> This is especially incorrect, since the code deliberately inserts a default
> timeout of 1m if no timeout was specified with a burst:
>
> > $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 -j DROP
> > nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 60s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes} counter drop
>
> The patch I suggested doesn't have that problem, because of forcing defaults to
> zero. Can doing that have any adverse side-effects?
Yes. Problem is that we cannot assume that hashlimit_mt_check() is
called. If you compile nftables with --with-xtables, listing of rules
that are added via iptables-compat will be translated to nftables.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations
2018-01-04 9:53 ` [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2018-01-04 10:56 ` Duncan Roe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Duncan Roe @ 2018-01-04 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter-devel
On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:53:28AM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 09:26:40AM +1100, Duncan Roe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:41:08PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > > iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 3000 -j DROP
> > >
> > > shows:
> > >
> > > nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 3s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes burst 6 packets} counter drop
> > >
> > > which prints burst twice, this is not correct.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
> > > ---
> > > extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c | 8 +++++---
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> > > index 472d8e7f6cc2..3fa5719127db 100644
> > > --- a/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> > > +++ b/extensions/libxt_hashlimit.c
> > > @@ -1350,10 +1350,12 @@ static int hashlimit_mt_xlate(struct xt_xlate *xl, const char *name,
> > >
> > > if (cfg->mode & XT_HASHLIMIT_BYTES)
> > > print_bytes_rate_xlate(xl, cfg);
> > > - else
> > > + else {
> > > print_packets_rate_xlate(xl, cfg->avg, revision);
> > > - if (cfg->burst != 5)
> > > - xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
> > > + if (cfg->burst != XT_HASHLIMIT_BURST)
> > > + xt_xlate_add(xl, " burst %lu packets", cfg->burst);
> > > +
> > > + }
> > > xt_xlate_add(xl, "}");
> > >
> > > return ret;
> > > --
> > > 2.11.0
> > >
> > This still discards a timeout of 1s (1000ms):
> >
> > > $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 --hashlimit-htable-expire 1000 -j DROP
> > > nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes} counter drop
> >
> > This is especially incorrect, since the code deliberately inserts a default
> > timeout of 1m if no timeout was specified with a burst:
> >
> > > $ iptables-translate -A INPUT -m tcp -p tcp --dport 80 -m hashlimit --hashlimit-above 200kb/s --hashlimit-burst 1mb --hashlimit-mode srcip,dstport --hashlimit-name http2 -j DROP
> > > nft add rule ip filter INPUT tcp dport 80 flow table http2 { tcp dport . ip saddr timeout 60s limit rate over 200 kbytes/second burst 1 mbytes} counter drop
> >
> > The patch I suggested doesn't have that problem, because of forcing defaults to
> > zero. Can doing that have any adverse side-effects?
>
> Yes. Problem is that we cannot assume that hashlimit_mt_check() is
> called. If you compile nftables with --with-xtables, listing of rules
> that are added via iptables-compat will be translated to nftables.
OK on that. But see my comments to your latest patch. I guess it should be
harmless to introduce a flags byte that no other code is aware of?
Cheers ... Duncan.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-04 11:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-01-03 14:41 [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-03 22:26 ` Duncan Roe
2018-01-03 22:59 ` And another thing Duncan Roe
2018-01-04 9:53 ` [PATCH iptables] extensions: hashlimit: fix incorrect burst in translations Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-01-04 10:56 ` Duncan Roe
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.