From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
syzbot
<bot+56c7151cad94eec37c521f0e47d2eee53f9361c4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: task hung in aead_recvmsg
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 13:35:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180105213555.GC44929@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171230083744.vuclnbs677tj7pi2@gauss3.secunet.de>
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 09:37:44AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 02:29:42PM -0600, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > [+Cc Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>]
> >
> >
> > I was able to reproduce this by trying to use 'pcrypt' recursively. I am not
> > 100% sure it is the exact same bug, but it probably is. Here is a C reproducer:
> >
> > #include <linux/if_alg.h>
> > #include <sys/socket.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > struct sockaddr_alg addr = {
> > .salg_type = "aead",
> > .salg_name = "pcrypt(pcrypt(rfc4106-gcm-aesni))",
> > };
> > int algfd, reqfd;
> > char buf[32] = { 0 };
> >
> > algfd = socket(AF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0);
> > bind(algfd, (void *)&addr, sizeof(addr));
> > setsockopt(algfd, SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_KEY, buf, 20);
> >
> > reqfd = accept(algfd, 0, 0);
> > write(reqfd, buf, 32);
> > read(reqfd, buf, 16);
> > }
> >
> > It seems the problem is that all 'pcrypt' instances use the same
> > 'padata_instance', which completes works in the order they are submitted. But
> > with nested use, the outer work is submitted before the inner work, so the inner
> > work isn't allowed to complete until the outer work does, which deadlocks
> > because actually the inner work needs to complete first.
> >
> > What a mess. Maybe there should be a separate 'padata_instance' per pcrypt
> > instance? Or maybe there should be a way for an algorithm to declare that it
> > can only appear in the stack one time?
>
> Having two nested pcrypt templates in one algorithm instance
> does not make so much sense in the first place. I thought
> that the crypto layer would refuse to build an instance
> with two nested templates of the same type.
>
> At least for pcrypt, refusing such instantiations would
> be the correct behaviour. Are there any other templates
> where a nested use would make sense?
Maybe. But either way, I don't see a straightforward way to prevent it
currently. In particular, the links from an instance to its inner algorithms
are stored in the crypto_instance_ctx() which has a template-specific format, so
it isn't currently possible to recursively search an instance to check whether a
particular template is present. We could perhaps add such links in a standard
format, though...
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-05 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <001a1140b8307b0439055ffc7872@google.com>
2017-12-12 16:46 ` INFO: task hung in aead_recvmsg Dmitry Vyukov
2017-12-23 20:29 ` Eric Biggers
2017-12-30 8:37 ` Steffen Klassert
2018-01-05 21:35 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
[not found] ` <20180310232231.19191-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20180323002152.GA30497@gondor.apana.org.au>
[not found] ` <20180408225528.GH685@sol.localdomain>
[not found] ` <20180409085807.2cwvr5cocz6gfbmv@gauss3.secunet.de>
[not found] ` <20180409190739.GC203367@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20180418053533.wuo6bj2okqdu2hrf@gauss3.secunet.de>
2019-02-20 4:06 ` [RFC PATCH] crypto: pcrypt - forbid recursive instantiation Herbert Xu
2019-02-20 11:42 ` Steffen Klassert
2019-03-01 3:38 ` Herbert Xu
2018-07-21 12:37 ` INFO: task hung in aead_recvmsg syzbot
2019-12-01 7:58 ` syzbot
2019-12-01 17:58 ` Stephan Müller
2019-12-01 19:22 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180105213555.GC44929@gmail.com \
--to=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
--cc=bot+56c7151cad94eec37c521f0e47d2eee53f9361c4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.