All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk, clm@fb.com, jbacik@fb.com
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com, Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu
Date: Mon,  8 Jan 2018 11:15:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180108191542.379478-9-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180108191542.379478-1-tj@kernel.org>

The RCU protection has been expanded to cover both queueing and
completion paths making ->queue_rq_srcu a misnomer.  Rename it to
->srcu as suggested by Bart.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com>
---
 block/blk-mq.c         | 14 +++++++-------
 include/linux/blk-mq.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 54ecb2c..071f396 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ void blk_mq_quiesce_queue(struct request_queue *q)
 
 	queue_for_each_hw_ctx(q, hctx, i) {
 		if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
-			synchronize_srcu(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+			synchronize_srcu(hctx->srcu);
 		else
 			rcu = true;
 	}
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void hctx_unlock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int srcu_idx)
 	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	else
-		srcu_read_unlock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu, srcu_idx);
+		srcu_read_unlock(hctx->srcu, srcu_idx);
 }
 
 static void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int *srcu_idx)
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static void hctx_lock(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, int *srcu_idx)
 	if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
 		rcu_read_lock();
 	else
-		*srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+		*srcu_idx = srcu_read_lock(hctx->srcu);
 }
 
 static void blk_mq_rq_update_aborted_gstate(struct request *rq, u64 gstate)
@@ -931,7 +931,7 @@ static void blk_mq_timeout_work(struct work_struct *work)
 			if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING))
 				has_rcu = true;
 			else
-				synchronize_srcu(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+				synchronize_srcu(hctx->srcu);
 
 			hctx->nr_expired = 0;
 		}
@@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ static void blk_mq_exit_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
 		set->ops->exit_hctx(hctx, hctx_idx);
 
 	if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
-		cleanup_srcu_struct(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+		cleanup_srcu_struct(hctx->srcu);
 
 	blk_mq_remove_cpuhp(hctx);
 	blk_free_flush_queue(hctx->fq);
@@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@ static int blk_mq_init_hctx(struct request_queue *q,
 		goto free_fq;
 
 	if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)
-		init_srcu_struct(hctx->queue_rq_srcu);
+		init_srcu_struct(hctx->srcu);
 
 	blk_mq_debugfs_register_hctx(q, hctx);
 
@@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ static int blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(struct blk_mq_tag_set *tag_set)
 {
 	int hw_ctx_size = sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx);
 
-	BUILD_BUG_ON(ALIGN(offsetof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, queue_rq_srcu),
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(ALIGN(offsetof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx, srcu),
 			   __alignof__(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx)) !=
 		     sizeof(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx));
 
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 460798d..8efcf49 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct blk_mq_hw_ctx {
 #endif
 
 	/* Must be the last member - see also blk_mq_hw_ctx_size(). */
-	struct srcu_struct	queue_rq_srcu[0];
+	struct srcu_struct	srcu[0];
 };
 
 struct blk_mq_tag_set {
-- 
2.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-08 19:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-08 19:15 [PATCHSET v4] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] blk-mq: move hctx lock/unlock into a helper Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 19:24   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:24     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] blk-mq: protect completion path with RCU Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 19:57   ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-01-08 20:15     ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-08 22:55       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-08 23:27         ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-01-08 23:33           ` Holger Hoffstätte
2018-01-09  7:08   ` Hannes Reinecke
2018-01-09 15:22     ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-09 16:12   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 16:12     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 16:17     ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-09 16:19     ` tj
2018-01-09 16:22       ` Jens Axboe
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] blk-mq: replace timeout synchronization with a RCU and generation based scheme Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 21:06   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 21:06     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 15:46     ` tj
2018-01-08 23:29   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 23:29     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 15:46     ` tj
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] blk-mq: use blk_mq_rq_state() instead of testing REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 22:03   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 22:03     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] blk-mq: make blk_abort_request() trigger timeout path Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 22:10   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 22:10     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-09 16:02     ` tj
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE usages from blk-mq Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 23:36   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 23:36     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] blk-mq: remove REQ_ATOM_STARTED Tejun Heo
2018-01-08 23:47   ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 23:47     ` Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 19:15 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2018-01-08 23:48   ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu Bart Van Assche
2018-01-08 23:48     ` Bart Van Assche
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-09 16:29 [PATCHSET v5] blk-mq: reimplement timeout handling Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 16:29 ` [PATCH 8/8] blk-mq: rename blk_mq_hw_ctx->queue_rq_srcu to ->srcu Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180108191542.379478-9-tj@kernel.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=jianchao.w.wang@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.