From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/arch_prctl: add ARCH_GET_NOPTI and ARCH_SET_NOPTI to enable/disable PTI
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:19:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110161929.GA14347@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180110160922.c26iaeley5nh3xk6@pd.tnic>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 05:09:22PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 04:39:46PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > For production, disabling PTI system-wide when I'm supposed to know what
> > performance critical processes should be exempted doesn't appeal me very
> > much, especially if it can happen by accident. So in the end I think that
> > "pti=off" on the cmdline should be the only way to disable it system-wide
> > as it doesn't represent a reasonable production case. Disabling it per
> > process should be allowed via a sysctl, which would also be locked disabled
> > for safety purposes.
>
> It still might make sense to be able to disable it system-wide without
> having to reboot. Imagine a bunch of processes showing performance
> regressions and you want to disable PTI completely to rule it out
> causing that regression. Then you toggle the master switch.
Well, indeed. It will never be 100% equivalent to pti=off however since
the alternative code will remain in place, but why not. Or maybe we have
a way to change the alternatives at run time by changing a sysctl, but
that doesn't please me a lot. I'll check this after the rest however,
as I'm not sure about the code implications in the entry code (i.e. we'd
rather not check a system wide variable, or we might need another per-CPU
one). We could also just mention that the setting only applies to future
processes, which will be much easier and probably sufficient.
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-09 12:56 [RFC PATCH v2 0/6] Per process PTI activation Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/6] x86/mm: add a pti_disable entry in mm_context_t Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/arch_prctl: add ARCH_GET_NOPTI and ARCH_SET_NOPTI to enable/disable PTI Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 14:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-09 14:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 14:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-09 14:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 21:26 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-09 21:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-09 21:32 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-09 22:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 22:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-09 22:29 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-09 22:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 14:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-10 15:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 16:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-10 16:19 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2018-01-10 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-10 7:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 7:37 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 7:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-09 23:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10 4:25 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 14:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-10 15:43 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 15:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-09 21:34 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-09 21:41 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 21:50 ` Kees Cook
2018-01-09 22:03 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 7:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-12 15:03 ` David Laight
2018-01-12 15:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/6] x86/pti: add a per-cpu variable pti_disable Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 7:29 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 8:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 8:50 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 9:00 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/6] x86/pti: don't mark the user PGD with _PAGE_NX Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/6] x86/entry/pti: avoid setting CR3 when it's already correct Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 7:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 7:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 20:29 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 6:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-09 12:56 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/6] x86/entry/pti: don't switch PGD on when pti_disable is set Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 7:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-10 7:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 8:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-10 9:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 19:21 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10 19:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-10 19:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-10 20:04 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-11 6:42 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 15:29 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 15:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 15:51 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 17:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-11 18:21 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-11 18:30 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 18:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-11 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-11 18:38 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-11 18:57 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 19:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-11 19:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-11 19:17 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 19:19 ` Olivier Galibert
2018-01-11 19:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-11 19:34 ` Alan Cox
2018-01-11 21:23 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 21:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-11 22:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-12 16:37 ` David Laight
2018-01-11 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-11 19:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2018-01-11 19:11 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 20:00 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 17:09 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-11 17:40 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 17:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-11 18:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 18:15 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 18:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-11 18:25 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-11 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-11 19:33 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-12 20:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-12 21:18 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-12 21:54 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 21:59 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-12 16:27 ` David Laight
2018-01-12 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-12 19:36 ` Willy Tarreau
2018-01-11 18:35 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-11 21:49 ` Willy Tarreau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110161929.GA14347@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.