From: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Steve Dickson <SteveD@RedHat.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add server-side support for junctions to nfs-utils
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:36:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110173656.GC26882@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a1d86617-608c-c4bc-6f96-c5deff60c7fb@RedHat.com>
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:26:10PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
> On 01/10/2018 12:17 PM, Bruce Fields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 12:13:39PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 01/09/2018 02:36 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Jan 9, 2018, at 2:21 PM, bfields@fieldses.org wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for doing this! I may not get the chance to do a real review,
> >>>> but I'm in favor of the basic idea.
> >>>
> >>> How do you feel about building support for junctions into mountd,
> >>> and getting rid of the libnfsjunct DLL ?
> >> I would rather not put new functionality in daemons that needs rpcbind.
> >> With the idea of, someday, having clean v4-only configuration
> >> (aka no mountd, statd, or lockd).
> >
> > rpc.mountd is used by v4 for a lot of stuff already, so it's not going
> > away.
> Understood.... I guess I'm looking for a way to replace it with
> a command the kernel can call to only do v4 stuff.
> Would something like that make sense?
It would be a fair amount of work and I don't think there's a strong
reason to do it.
rpc.mountd -N2 -N3 should do what we want.
--b.
>
> > Is it trying to register with rpcbind in the case it's called
> > with -N2 -N3? That would be a bug.
> Looking at the code... probably not...
>
> steved.
> >
> > --b.
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-08 21:49 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add server-side support for junctions to nfs-utils Chuck Lever
2018-01-08 21:50 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] Add LDAP-free version of libnfsjunct " Chuck Lever
2018-01-08 21:50 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] Add 'nfsref' command Chuck Lever
2018-01-09 19:21 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] Add server-side support for junctions to nfs-utils J. Bruce Fields
2018-01-09 19:36 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-10 17:13 ` Steve Dickson
2018-01-10 17:17 ` Bruce Fields
2018-01-10 17:26 ` Steve Dickson
2018-01-10 17:36 ` Bruce Fields [this message]
2018-01-10 19:42 ` Chuck Lever
2018-01-11 14:20 ` Steve Dickson
2018-01-11 15:17 ` Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110173656.GC26882@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=SteveD@RedHat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.