From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Frysinger Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] include inttypes.h for PRI defines Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:12:33 -0500 Message-ID: <20180110221233.GC7217@vapier> References: <20180110035053.4900-1-vapier@gentoo.org> <20180110104224.rf2s4c2y26drvwf6@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1867184756==" Return-path: Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454D96E382 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 22:12:34 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <20180110104224.rf2s4c2y26drvwf6@platvala-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" To: Petri Latvala Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1867184756== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ" Content-Disposition: inline --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 10 Jan 2018 12:42, Petri Latvala wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:50:53PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D96620 > > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger > > --- > > lib/igt_fb.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >=20 >=20 > Files matching "PRI[diuoxX]" but not "inttypes.h": >=20 > lib/igt_fb.c > lib/igt_kms.c > lib/intel_os.c > tests/prime_nv_pcopy.c > tools/hsw_compute_wrpll.c > tools/intel_gpu_top.c > tools/intel_opregion_decode.c > tools/intel_residency.c > tools/intel_watermark.c >=20 > Looks like they get inttypes.h here via >=20 > igt.h and pals -> intel_chipset.h -> pciaccess.h -> inttypes.h >=20 > The mystery is why the other files haven't slapped you with the same > issue. Regardless, same change should be done in all of those. Can you > expand this patch? yeah i patched the one that was failing rather than looking deeper. i can update them all. -mike --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEuQK1JxMl+JKsJRrUQWM7n+g39YEFAlpWj9AACgkQQWM7n+g3 9YFYpBAAznGiDprDWMfV3jeVwVB1zR6xBwbGiCNdcCIKLBtWEcWB3n/k9bMBd5kE ifAh8HqMuSji/NhEewOrp/9KJ0iBSyct5BD7BFSVk/mgP0EH28spkQ8+DDnOgzOH p/alVf8SPwRe+rXLJ0wIJ2vMq6Auxm6PNq/ze/vu60H9Ldbk8HxpoQiVHlnXfqK6 4r/ZvZZQyeVrrnqz36IBgHBuPLkaSG9tRIxnKJiNRbQ8CHvyhlCjf5gJjyWYiYVY +s+13aULvywci8ohGatwNm1rkaysLXVL2ICXwSZru/CBGW3NvGKr4XcWgfm0WIpA t954tfsiWd0tMSQqvkVUGFE/0tbUyXkZ17vbZ+zR93x+F05tHP1EZMuibkfnBIEa 5M+av8LH9unQ8NknfsmnEMXMKsmT76TY+GXi1OmzAXdZZKmw7Obsg4+ikXKIt3FX vzrY2Dgd/CapK0IkUvusbZHlHE985HidcBTILzWIdTbBjjRPHbY6jfZg6yuVYdxp kJVMwwK4ZEopPU+PIA2ERoHGk4tSL60vzFVJxn6oRtN97RYnvWLdr1vIPXW60e8Z B6vzN5uny/GqVxw0R+BYNRONyo4rORVTQB2ok3FLAPwCiqdVGP1rgcBwvvFVtFM5 2XcaaxR7uFXWjeloFPmGS86tsvmOcSZYDlRJtFCa3MXtq5JCRAg= =m/c3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YD3LsXFS42OYHhNZ-- --===============1867184756== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KSW50ZWwtZ2Z4 IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApJbnRlbC1nZnhAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vaW50ZWwtZ2Z4Cg== --===============1867184756==--