From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] openvswitch: add erspan version II support
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 22:35:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110223514.1e5030cd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1515549082-4141-3-git-send-email-u9012063@gmail.com>
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 17:51:22 -0800, William Tu wrote:
> - [OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTS] = { .len = sizeof(u32) },
> + [OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTSV1] = { .len = sizeof(u32) },
> + [OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTS] = { .len = OVS_ATTR_NESTED,
> + .next = ovs_erspan_opt_lens },
Ouch. It's actually much worse than that, you're redefining the meaning of
the field. That's complete no-go.
> + case OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTSV1:
> + OVS_NLERR(log, "ERSPAN attribute %d is deprecated.",
> + type);
> + return -EINVAL;
As is this.
> @@ -906,8 +1017,8 @@ static int __ip_tun_to_nlattr(struct sk_buff *skb,
> vxlan_opt_to_nlattr(skb, tun_opts, swkey_tun_opts_len))
> return -EMSGSIZE;
> else if (output->tun_flags & TUNNEL_ERSPAN_OPT &&
> - nla_put_be32(skb, OVS_TUNNEL_KEY_ATTR_ERSPAN_OPTS,
> - ((struct erspan_metadata *)tun_opts)->u.index))
> + erspan_opt_to_nlattr(skb, tun_opts,
> + swkey_tun_opts_len))
And this.
The existing field must continue to work in the same way as before. It must
be accepted and *returned* by the kernel. You may add an additional field
but the existing behavior must be 100% preserved, both uABI and uAPI wise.
Jiri
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-10 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-10 1:51 [PATCHv2 net-next 0/2] net: erspan: add support for openvswitch William Tu
2018-01-10 1:51 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 1/2] net: erspan: use bitfield instead of mask and offset William Tu
2018-01-10 1:51 ` [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] openvswitch: add erspan version II support William Tu
2018-01-10 21:29 ` Jiri Benc
2018-01-10 21:35 ` Jiri Benc [this message]
2018-01-10 22:02 ` Jiri Benc
2018-01-11 16:34 ` William Tu
2018-01-12 8:27 ` Jiri Benc
2018-01-12 18:39 ` Pravin Shelar
2018-01-12 19:22 ` William Tu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180110223514.1e5030cd@redhat.com \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=u9012063@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.