Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v6 04/27] qobject: let object_property_get_str() use new API

[Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 06:59:13AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 01:57 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 04:53:40PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> >> On 12/19/2017 02:45 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> >>> We can simplify object_property_get_str() using the new
> >>> qobject_get_try_str().
> >>>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>  qom/object.c | 9 +++------
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> I'm not opposed to your patch split (particularly since it makes
> >> backports easier if it just needs the new function and then your later
> >> uses of the new function, without touching existing uses); but I might
> >> have merged this with the previous patch so that the new API has a
> >> client right away, proving why the new API is worthwhile as part of its
> >> introduction.
> > 
> > Sure, I'll follow the rule next time.
> > 
> > (I can simply squash it but I got a few r-bs for separate patches
> >  already, so I'll keep them separated for now)
> 
> Keeping it separate is fine, especially since you have r-b.
> 
> Another factor in my personal workflow - if I'm going to be converting
> lots of users, but the users span over multiple areas of the code, then
> introducing the helper in one patch, and then a series of conversions to
> start using it, makes sense.  But if I'm converting just one existing
> user, that's a refactoring, and doing it all at once is easier (prior to
> adding the new code that becomes the second user).  I guess the moral of
> the story is that patch splitting is an art form, and there's more than
> one way to do things that still end up nice and reviewable.

Agreed.  I started to learn how to split patches since when I started
to work on QEMU, and obvious now I'm still learning. :-)

Thanks Eric.

-- 
Peter Xu