All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)
Subject: [PATCH] nvme_fc: correct hang in nvme_ns_remove()
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 16:46:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180111234636.GA3243@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb86826e-3850-013b-ca07-e89021ea572e@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018@03:34:58PM -0800, James Smart wrote:
> If you compare behavior of FC with rdma, rdma starts the queues at the tail
> end of losing connectivity to the device - meaning any pending io and any
> future io issued while connectivity has yet to
> be re-established (e.g. in RECONNECTING state) will fail with an io
> error. This is good, if there is a multipathing config, as it's a
> near-immediate fast fail scenario. But... if there is no multipath,
> it means applications and filesystems are now seeing io errors while
> connectivity is pending and that can be disastrous.  FC currently
> leaves the queues quiesced while connectivity is pending so io errors are
> not seen. But this means FC won't fastfail the ios to the
> multipath'er.
> 
> For now I want to fix this keeping the existing FC behavior. From there, I'd
> like the transports to block like FC does so no errors. However, a new timer
> would be introduced for a "fast failure timeout" - which starts at loss of
> connectivity and when expires, starts the queues and fails any pending and
> future io.
> 
> Thoughts ?

Yes, I think that sounds ok.

Longer term, I think it's a bit tacky that we rely on queue_rq to check
for early termination states. Since we can quiece blk-mq, it'd be better
if we introduce another tag iterator to end unstarted requests directly
when we need to give up on the request, rather than rely on queue_rq. I
was going to post a patch that does just that, but I still haven't gotten
a chance to test it... :(

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-11 23:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-11 23:21 [PATCH] nvme_fc: correct hang in nvme_ns_remove() James Smart
2018-01-11 23:34 ` James Smart
2018-01-11 23:46   ` Keith Busch [this message]
2018-01-14 10:44     ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-01-14 10:44 ` Sagi Grimberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180111234636.GA3243@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=keith.busch@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.