From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/10] objtool: Implement base jump_assert support
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:28:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116143241.120894616@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20180116142825.376986833@infradead.org
[-- Attachment #1: peter_zijlstra-q-objtool_vs_jump_label.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4017 bytes --]
Implement a jump_label assertion that asserts that the code location
is indeed only reachable through a static_branch. Because if GCC is
absolutely retaded it could generate code like:
xor rax,rax
NOP/JMP 1f
mov $1, rax
1:
test rax,rax
jz 2f
<do-code>
2:
instead of the sensible:
NOP/JMP 1f
<do-code>
1:
This implements objtool infrastructure for ensuring the code ends up
sane, since we'll rely on that for correctness and security.
We tag the instructions after the static branch with static_jump_dest=true;
that is the instruction after the NOP and the instruction at the
JMP+disp site.
Then, when we read the .discard.jump_assert section, we assert that
each entry points to an instruction that has static_jump_dest set.
With this we can assert that the code emitted for the if statement
ends up at the static jump location and nothing untowards happened.
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
tools/objtool/check.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
tools/objtool/check.h | 1
2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -687,8 +687,17 @@ static int handle_jump_alt(struct objtoo
struct instruction *orig_insn,
struct instruction **new_insn)
{
- if (orig_insn->type == INSN_NOP)
+ struct instruction *next_insn = list_next_entry(orig_insn, list);
+
+ if (orig_insn->type == INSN_NOP) {
+ /*
+ * If orig_insn is a NOP, then new_insn is the branch target
+ * for when it would've been a JMP.
+ */
+ next_insn->static_jump_dest = true;
+ (*new_insn)->static_jump_dest = true;
return 0;
+ }
if (orig_insn->type != INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL) {
WARN_FUNC("unsupported instruction at jump label",
@@ -696,7 +705,16 @@ static int handle_jump_alt(struct objtoo
return -1;
}
- *new_insn = list_next_entry(orig_insn, list);
+ /*
+ * Otherwise, orig_insn is a JMP and it will have orig_insn->jump_dest.
+ * In this case we'll effectively NOP the alt by pointing new_insn at
+ * next_insn.
+ */
+ orig_insn->jump_dest->static_jump_dest = true;
+ next_insn->static_jump_dest = true;
+
+ *new_insn = next_insn;
+
return 0;
}
@@ -1067,6 +1085,50 @@ static int read_unwind_hints(struct objt
return 0;
}
+static int assert_static_jumps(struct objtool_file *file)
+{
+ struct section *sec, *relasec;
+ struct instruction *insn;
+ struct rela *rela;
+ int i;
+
+ sec = find_section_by_name(file->elf, ".discard.jump_assert");
+ if (!sec)
+ return 0;
+
+ relasec = sec->rela;
+ if (!relasec) {
+ WARN("missing .rela.discard.jump_assert section");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (sec->len % sizeof(unsigned long)) {
+ WARN("jump_assert size mismatch: %d %ld", sec->len, sizeof(unsigned long));
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sec->len / sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
+ rela = find_rela_by_dest(sec, i * sizeof(unsigned long));
+ if (!rela) {
+ WARN("can't find rela for jump_assert[%d]", i);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ insn = find_insn(file, rela->sym->sec, rela->addend);
+ if (!insn) {
+ WARN("can't find insn for jump_assert[%d]", i);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (!insn->static_jump_dest) {
+ WARN_FUNC("static assert FAIL", insn->sec, insn->offset);
+ return -1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int decode_sections(struct objtool_file *file)
{
int ret;
@@ -2000,6 +2062,10 @@ int check(const char *_objname, bool _no
goto out;
warnings += ret;
+ ret = assert_static_jumps(&file);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
if (list_empty(&file.insn_list))
goto out;
--- a/tools/objtool/check.h
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct instruction {
unsigned char type;
unsigned long immediate;
bool alt_group, visited, dead_end, ignore, hint, save, restore, ignore_alts;
+ bool static_jump_dest;
struct symbol *call_dest;
struct instruction *jump_dest;
struct list_head alts;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-16 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] objtool validation of static branches and retpoline Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Reindent _static_cpu_has Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 15:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] x86: Update _static_cpu_has to use all named variables Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 11:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 15:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 15:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] x86: Add a type field to alt_instr Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 22:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-16 22:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 23:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-18 11:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] x86: Annotate static_cpu_has alternative Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 23:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 14:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 14:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-18 13:33 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-18 15:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] objtool: Add retpoline validation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: Annotate dynamic jump in head_64.S Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] objtool: More complex static jump implementation Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 15:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 3:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 8:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-16 19:49 ` [PATCH v2 11/10] objtool: Even more complex static block checks Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 3:12 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-17 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-17 14:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180116143241.120894616@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.