From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/msm: Claim bus ops on probe Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:27:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20180117142720.GT28161@8bytes.org> References: <20180117133331.vidtyduiu7zr3fwc@8bytes.org> <20180117135356.GQ28161@8bytes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: iommu-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: iommu-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, srinivas.kandagatla-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 02:05:21PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > The IOMMU_OF_DECLARE() in ipmmu-vmsa.c added in 4.15 is missed by the > prototype change in (4.14-based) v1 2/2 - by applying v2 2/3 on top of the > two v1 patches you will end up with an extra NULL argument there which will > then fail to compile. v2 3/3 supersedes v1 2/2 by removing that one as well. > This is entirely my fault for hacking out some quick patches on top of > unrelated development work instead of creating a fresh branch... Okay, I see. So I removed the two patches from arm/msm and the one patch from arm/renesas and applied all 3 patches from v2 to the core branch instead. Thanks, Joerg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:27:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] iommu/msm: Claim bus ops on probe In-Reply-To: References: <20180117133331.vidtyduiu7zr3fwc@8bytes.org> <20180117135356.GQ28161@8bytes.org> Message-ID: <20180117142720.GT28161@8bytes.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 02:05:21PM +0000, Robin Murphy wrote: > The IOMMU_OF_DECLARE() in ipmmu-vmsa.c added in 4.15 is missed by the > prototype change in (4.14-based) v1 2/2 - by applying v2 2/3 on top of the > two v1 patches you will end up with an extra NULL argument there which will > then fail to compile. v2 3/3 supersedes v1 2/2 by removing that one as well. > This is entirely my fault for hacking out some quick patches on top of > unrelated development work instead of creating a fresh branch... Okay, I see. So I removed the two patches from arm/msm and the one patch from arm/renesas and applied all 3 patches from v2 to the core branch instead. Thanks, Joerg