From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Cornelia Huck" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Jon Masters" <jcm@redhat.com>,
"Marcus Meissner" <meissner@suse.de>,
"Jiri Kosina" <jkosina@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 07:27:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180118072732.095bfddb@mschwideX1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90ae6d5a-9f86-964b-74ca-e0971a11f497@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:43:24 +0100
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Conny can you review and ack as well?
>
> Paolo, Radim,
>
> As the other patches need to sync on the ifetch/nospec/gmb naming I have changed my mind. :-)
> This patch is independent from the other patches (as it just provides the guest facilities not caring
> about what the host does).
>
> It seems that you do a kvm pull request for 4.15 anyway (for power), so it might make sense to
> apply this patch as well for 4.15. this will make it easier to also upstream the QEMU part in time
> as we need the uabi interfaces.
Indeed, there is no real dependency. I am thinking about doing a split of my patches as well,
everything but the gmb/nospec_xxx/ifetch/isync/whatever part. The prctl part needs some more
discussion, as will prepare a patch. Or two.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-18 6:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 9:48 [PATCH 0/6] s390: improve speculative execution handling Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-17 9:48 ` [PATCH 1/6] s390/alternative: use a copy of the facility bit mask Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-17 13:54 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-17 14:24 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-17 9:48 ` [PATCH 2/6] s390: implement nospec_[load|ptr] Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-17 12:41 ` Jiri Kosina
2018-01-17 14:52 ` Jon Masters
2018-01-17 13:58 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-17 14:04 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 9:48 ` [PATCH 3/6] s390: add options to change branch prediction behaviour for the kernel Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-18 9:52 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-19 4:53 ` QingFeng Hao
2018-01-17 9:48 ` [PATCH 4/6] s390: add system call to run tasks with modified branch prediction Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-17 10:03 ` Florian Weimer
2018-01-17 10:05 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 11:14 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 11:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 11:55 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-17 13:25 ` Heiko Carstens
2018-01-17 9:48 ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: s390: wire up seb feature Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-17 11:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 11:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 11:28 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 11:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 11:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-17 11:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-17 11:39 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 13:44 ` [PATCH v2] KVM: s390: wire up bpb feature Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 13:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2018-01-17 21:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-18 6:27 ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2018-01-18 9:59 ` Cornelia Huck
2018-01-18 10:09 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 9:48 ` [PATCH 6/6] s390: scrub registers on kernel entry and KVM exit Martin Schwidefsky
2018-01-19 6:29 ` QingFeng Hao
2018-01-19 7:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-19 8:27 ` QingFeng Hao
2018-01-17 12:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] s390: improve speculative execution handling Cornelia Huck
2018-01-17 12:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2018-01-17 13:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180118072732.095bfddb@mschwideX1 \
--to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=meissner@suse.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.