All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ganesh Goudar <ganeshgr@chelsio.com>
To: Arjun Vynipadath <arjun@chelsio.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, leedom@chelsio.com, santosh@chelsio.com,
	nirranjan@chelsio.com, kumaras@chelsio.com,
	swise@opengridcomputing.com, hare@suse.de
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION, bisect] pci: cxgb4 probe fails after commit 104daa71b3961434 ("PCI: Determine actual VPD size on first access")
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 18:13:26 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180123124323.GA21413@chelsio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1516710549-26660-1-git-send-email-arjun@chelsio.com>

+Hannes Reinecke

On Tuesday, January 01/23/18, 2018 at 17:59:09 +0530, Arjun Vynipadath wrote:
> Sending on behalf of "Casey Leedom <leedom@chelsio.com>"
> 
> Way back on April 11, 2016 we reported a regression in Linux kernel 4.6-rc2 
> brought on by kernel.org commit 104daa71b396. This commit calculates the 
> size of a PCI Device's VPD area by parsing the VPD Structure at offset 0x000, 
> and restricts accesses to the VPD to that computed size.
> 
> Our devices have a second VPD structure which is located starting at offset 
> 0x400 which is the "real" VPD[1].  The 104daa71b396 commit (plus a follow on 
> commit 408641e93aa5) caused efforts to read past the end of that computed 
> length of the VPD to return silently without error leaving stack junk in the 
> VPD read buffers.
> 
> We introduced kernel.org commit cb92148b to allow a driver to tell the 
> kernel how large the VPD area really is, introducing a new API 
> pci_set_vpd_size() for this purpose.
> 
> Now we've discovered a new subtlety to the problem.
> 
> We have a KVM Hypervisor running a 4.9.70 kernel.  So it has all of the 
> above commits.  When we attach our Physical Function 4 to a Virtual Machine 
> and attempt to run cxgb4 in that VM, we see the problem again.  The issue is 
> that all of the VM Guest OS's efforts to access the PCIe VPD Capability are 
> trapped into the KVM 4.9.70 kernel and executed there, with the results 
> routed back to the VM Guest OS.  The cxgb4 driver in the VM Guest OS uses 
> the new pci_set_vpd_size() to notify the OS of the true size of the VPD, but 
> that information of course is never sent to the KVM 4.9.70 Hypervisor. 
> (And, truth be told, if the Guest OS were older than 4.6, it wouldn't even 
> know that it needed to do this.)  The result is that again we get silent VPD 
> read failures with random stack garbage in the VPD read buffers. (sigh) 
> 
> It strikes me that the only way to handle this issue is to have KVM 
> circumvent the VPD-Size Restricted logic which was added in kernel.org 
> commits 104daa71b396 and 408641e93aa5.  Maybe via a __pci_read_vpd() or 
> similar API.  But we are open to other suggestions.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Casey.
> 
> [1] Chelsio adapters actually have two VPD structures stored in the VPD.  An
>     abbreviated on at Offset 0x0 and the complete VPD at Offset 0x400.  The
>     abbreviated one only contains the PN, SN and EC Keywords, while the
>     complete VPD contains those plus various adapter constants contained in
>     V0, V1, etc.  And it also contains the Base Ethernet MAC Address in the
>     "NA" Keyword which the cxgb4 driver needs when it can't contact the
>     adapter firmware.  (We don't have the "NA" Keyword in the VPD Structure
>     at Offset 0x000 because that's not an allowed VPD Keyword in the PCI-E
>     3.0 specification.)
> 
>     Note that two other drivers look like they may also do something
>     similar, the Broadcom bnx2x and tg3.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-23 12:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-23 12:29 [REGRESSION, bisect] pci: cxgb4 probe fails after commit 104daa71b3961434 ("PCI: Determine actual VPD size on first access") Arjun Vynipadath
2018-01-23 12:43 ` Ganesh Goudar [this message]
2018-02-12 17:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-02-12 17:56   ` Alexander Duyck
2018-02-12 18:06     ` Casey Leedom
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-04-12  5:29 Hariprasad Shenai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180123124323.GA21413@chelsio.com \
    --to=ganeshgr@chelsio.com \
    --cc=arjun@chelsio.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=kumaras@chelsio.com \
    --cc=leedom@chelsio.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nirranjan@chelsio.com \
    --cc=santosh@chelsio.com \
    --cc=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.