From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:36:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com ([IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::244]:40909 "EHLO mail-lf0-x244.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S23992391AbeAWTgQM2snk (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 20:36:16 +0100 Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id h92so2079533lfi.7 for ; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:36:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=KnPNDa5vVgxQ1CH4HMSBawCpkT67+Y6KwqmWhTjlqz0=; b=phoHDO+jQ6UXTGKoUcdCQeB7HEaoiaEuDbsjS9rz8qaPHtmKYYXIMzP1Vy02Xy7+OK lVvQ/cOjhZzAItHGrZDTHZdWfS4PjsbFBFHrGCF+GDotRv8LSoXYtvFcJ3xjKPnjLjgP dVe98SCxi9jdTPTZk1GUyVeaxaOHfmnJkmVE23zWO7kgbrGFLdwv/oHXmpk1+FFETJkd cFaKdNwgtYhNjo6kmKr22qwUxb+wqQOSmCU+ZQOpgFujAwduE7UX9ego1UIXX1YnWg+k S7eccb6l9Y3ASbpecRX3lom3plMi4fdO9A/dQkAZISis+C4EyPOUOvtTGCsIrX4YyEtf JLfg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KnPNDa5vVgxQ1CH4HMSBawCpkT67+Y6KwqmWhTjlqz0=; b=N8CZahLXcQnp3+5XwEhYWEG3iL2oha/kgUKuh6/UYVYtLaAV5UmtuFizjlJ8n+GShH Ng1pR1gMVaOoVUroJNDEkRQjLkwBJpx80GbHelJvcZL9CEgS5izaa4f8jx/BmA4RSdAY fg/x7pjn6u1emtGHqBhkWE+UUp8RPlmMxBXFwK30A5q+YVccdrRpBDhr6G36KCR6JOvm hHiLmYRiRljEuaQ2pJm9YOGAodhBqmGFnO7/niw+G/u6f0ZVEOb/nmRtbRHHwJlCSIh1 ILAkNKFNF4MpeZSSQ9I8HoCi7NiIk2KQU6t1eGqV6U10vFTpoAoc5T6iXjxvIoeNGWFz IIBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfSorOrCu6XsDXJes9+ODoHDip8j3IbUamjnkR15aECO/ZdrYQQ ACBV4Q3ll1VXAkHexnLEghAwpU8D X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x2249XWqJVkFqpR9yv5NZMS3YUonbX7WufdPREa6YtWSw0x4XmIKpBSHGSY9dsuW+d8tQvzxCAg== X-Received: by 10.46.58.6 with SMTP id h6mr1937388lja.2.1516736170717; Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:36:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mobilestation ([95.79.164.146]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q77sm166816lfd.17.2018.01.23.11.36.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:36:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 22:36:23 +0300 From: Serge Semin To: Jiaxun Yang Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/14] MIPS: memblock: Discard bootmem from Loongson3 code Message-ID: <20180123193623.GC28147@mobilestation> References: <20180117222312.14763-1-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <20180117222312.14763-13-fancer.lancer@gmail.com> <1516746524.20678.6.camel@flygoat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1516746524.20678.6.camel@flygoat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 62289 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: fancer.lancer@gmail.com Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips Hello Jiaxun, On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:28:44PM +0000, Jiaxun Yang wrote: > 在 2018-01-18四的 01:23 +0300，Serge Semin写道： > Hi Serge > > > Loongson64/3 runs its own code to initialize memory allocator in > > case of NUMA configuration is selected. So in order to move to the > > pure memblock utilization we discard the bootmem allocator usage > > and insert the memblock reservation method for > > kernel/addrspace_offset > > memory regions. > > Thanks for your patch. However, In my test, the system didn't boot > anymore with your patch. Since I don't have any lowlevel debug > instuments(ejtag or something). I can't provide any detail about the > problem. Just let you know that we have a problem here. > Thanks for performing the tests of the patchset. I really appreciate this. Regarding the problems you got. You must be doing something wrong, since Matt Redfearn already did the tests on Loongson3: https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/1/22/610 and the kernel turns out to be booting without troubles. So could you make sure, that you did everything right? Particularly, you said the patch (singular) isn't working. But this patch functionality depends on the whole patchset. Did you apply all the patches I sent and fully rebuild the kernel then? Regards, -Sergey > > -- > Jiaxun Yang