From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, idosch@mellanox.com,
roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag
Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:00:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180124030004.4016-4-dsahern@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180124030004.4016-1-dsahern@gmail.com>
Similar to IPv4 allow routes to be added with the RTNH_F_ONLINK flag.
The onlink option requires a gateway and a nexthop device. Any unicast
gateway is allowed (including IPv4 mapped addresses and unresolved
ones) as long as the gateway is not a local address and if it resolves
it must match the given device.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 00acf0103037..842b2646f1c0 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -2470,6 +2470,58 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_nh_lookup_table(struct net *net,
return rt;
}
+static int ip6_route_onlink_check(struct fib6_config *cfg,
+ struct net_device *dev,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ u32 tbid;
+
+ if (!dev) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device required for onlink");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+
+ if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop device is not up");
+ return -ENETDOWN;
+ }
+
+ tbid = l3mdev_fib_table(dev) ? : RT_TABLE_MAIN;
+ if (cfg->fc_table && cfg->fc_table != tbid) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
+ "Table id mismatch between given table and device");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ cfg->fc_table = tbid;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int ip6_route_check_nh_onlink(struct net *net,
+ struct fib6_config *cfg,
+ struct net_device *dev,
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+ const struct in6_addr *gw_addr = &cfg->fc_gateway;
+ u32 flags = RTF_LOCAL | RTF_ANYCAST | RTF_REJECT;
+ struct rt6_info *grt;
+ int err;
+
+ err = 0;
+ grt = ip6_nh_lookup_table(net, cfg, gw_addr, 0);
+ if (grt) {
+ if (grt->rt6i_flags & flags || dev != grt->dst.dev) {
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Nexthop has invalid gateway");
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ ip6_rt_put(grt);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
static int ip6_route_check_nh(struct net *net,
struct fib6_config *cfg,
struct net_device **_dev,
@@ -2571,6 +2623,12 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
if (cfg->fc_metric == 0)
cfg->fc_metric = IP6_RT_PRIO_USER;
+ if (cfg->fc_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK) {
+ err = ip6_route_onlink_check(cfg, dev, extack);
+ if (err)
+ goto out;
+ }
+
err = -ENOBUFS;
if (cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh &&
!(cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE)) {
@@ -2731,7 +2789,12 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
goto out;
}
- err = ip6_route_check_nh(net, cfg, &dev, &idev);
+ if (cfg->fc_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK) {
+ err = ip6_route_check_nh_onlink(net, cfg, dev,
+ extack);
+ } else {
+ err = ip6_route_check_nh(net, cfg, &dev, &idev);
+ }
if (err)
goto out;
}
@@ -2767,6 +2830,7 @@ static struct rt6_info *ip6_route_info_create(struct fib6_config *cfg,
if (!(rt->rt6i_flags & (RTF_LOCAL | RTF_ANYCAST)) &&
!netif_carrier_ok(dev))
rt->rt6i_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
+ rt->rt6i_nh_flags |= (cfg->fc_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK);
rt->dst.dev = dev;
rt->rt6i_idev = idev;
rt->rt6i_table = table;
@@ -3836,6 +3900,8 @@ static int rtm_to_fib6_config(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
if (rtm->rtm_flags & RTM_F_CLONED)
cfg->fc_flags |= RTF_CACHE;
+ cfg->fc_flags |= (rtm->rtm_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK);
+
cfg->fc_nlinfo.portid = NETLINK_CB(skb).portid;
cfg->fc_nlinfo.nlh = nlh;
cfg->fc_nlinfo.nl_net = sock_net(skb->sk);
@@ -4241,6 +4307,7 @@ static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt,
goto nla_put_failure;
}
+ *flags |= (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_ONLINK);
if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_OFFLOAD)
*flags |= RTNH_F_OFFLOAD;
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-24 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-24 3:00 [PATCH net-next 0/3] net/ipv6: Add support for ONLINK flag David Ahern
2018-01-24 3:00 ` [PATCH net-next 1/3] net/ipv6: Move gateway validation into helper David Ahern
2018-01-24 3:00 ` [PATCH net-next 2/3] net/ipv6: Add flags arg to ip6_nh_lookup_table David Ahern
2018-01-24 3:00 ` David Ahern [this message]
2018-01-24 22:08 ` [PATCH net-next 3/3] net/ipv6: Add support for onlink flag David Ahern
2018-01-24 22:53 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180124030004.4016-4-dsahern@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=idosch@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.