All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20180124224711.GF14790@localhost.localdomain>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 5f9dcff..2998ccf 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-On Wed, Jan 24, 2018@11:29:12PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
+On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:29:12PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
 > Am 22.01.2018 um 22:30 schrieb Keith Busch:
 > > The nvme spec guides toward longer times than that. I don't see the
 > > point of warning users about things operating within spec.
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ For controllers that pre-date this field, we're supposed to wait a
 
 The spec does not recommend a maximum time in either case.
 
-> In my opinion, it?s a good thing to point users to devices holding up
+> In my opinion, it’s a good thing to point users to devices holding up
 > suspend.
 
 If a device shutdown exceeds its reported constraints, then absolutely,
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 888bf04..33c584a 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,12 +1,18 @@
  "ref\09e398971-762d-bb1a-f798-bf0b18cb5b6b@molgen.mpg.de\0"
  "ref\020180122213024.GR12043@localhost.localdomain\0"
  "ref\0fd0eb2c3-56c3-0e81-cfba-1ffa6a872efd@molgen.mpg.de\0"
- "From\0keith.busch@intel.com (Keith Busch)\0"
- "Subject\0Report long suspend times of NVMe devices (mostly firmware/device issues)\0"
+ "From\0Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: Report long suspend times of NVMe devices (mostly firmware/device issues)\0"
  "Date\0Wed, 24 Jan 2018 15:47:12 -0700\0"
+ "To\0Paul Menzel <pmenzel+linux-nvme@molgen.mpg.de>\0"
+ "Cc\0Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>"
+  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
+  Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
+  linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org
+ " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "On Wed, Jan 24, 2018@11:29:12PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:\n"
+ "On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 11:29:12PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:\n"
  "> Am 22.01.2018 um 22:30 schrieb Keith Busch:\n"
  "> > The nvme spec guides toward longer times than that. I don't see the\n"
  "> > point of warning users about things operating within spec.\n"
@@ -30,7 +36,7 @@
  "\n"
  "The spec does not recommend a maximum time in either case.\n"
  "\n"
- "> In my opinion, it?s a good thing to point users to devices holding up\n"
+ "> In my opinion, it\342\200\231s a good thing to point users to devices holding up\n"
  "> suspend.\n"
  "\n"
  "If a device shutdown exceeds its reported constraints, then absolutely,\n"
@@ -40,4 +46,4 @@
  "to create alarmed people demanding answers to a warning about behavior\n"
  that is entirely normal.
 
-7f415251f07aa5adbc02c86101167442e26ac3b3c7f753de6583e4cc46889263
+3fde816b4f4faeaf4a8a12c1a4398cd59bdd9c56b91824e38e2f328a996747f1

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.