Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3 V1] rtnetlink: enable IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_{DEL,SET}LINK

[Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@canonical.com>]

On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 01:59:06PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Based on the previous discussion this enables passing a IFLA_IF_NETNSID
> > property along with RTM_SETLINK and RTM_DELLINK requests. The patch for
> > RTM_NEWLINK will be sent out in a separate patch since there are more
> > corner-cases to think about.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Christian
> > 
> > Changelog 2018-01-24:
> > * Preserve old behavior and report -ENODEV when either ifindex or ifname is
> >   provided and IFLA_GROUP is set. Spotted by Wolfgang Bumiller.
> > 
> > Christian Brauner (3):
> >   rtnetlink: enable IFLA_IF_NETNSID in do_setlink()
> >   rtnetlink: enable IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_SETLINK
> >   rtnetlink: enable IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_DELLINK
> > 
> >  net/core/rtnetlink.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> >  1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.14.1
> > 
> 
> I've done more testing around enabling IFLA_IF_NETNSID for RTM_NEWLINK
> as well and I think that the change is actually trivial. However, I
> would like to wait before sending this patch out until we have agreed on
> the patches for RTM_SETLINK and RTM_DELLINK in this series. Once we have
> merged those I can just send another small commit. Or - if changes to
> this patch series are required - I can just add it in a v2.

Jiri, do you want that patch resent with the small commit for
RTM_NEWLINK included or are you fine with sending it after this series?

Thanks!
Christian