All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH 3/3] syscalls: Add a bit of documentation to __SYSCALL_DEFINE
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2018 22:50:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180128225031.GJ13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzScvPkO0JN_OReKMoyRC5KRbn_8bmWKkxVdi9m_X+cgQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 12:42:24PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> The 64-bit argument for 32-bit case would end up having to have a few
> more of those architecture-specific oddities. So not just
> "argument1(ptregs)", but "argument2_32_64(ptregs)" or something that
> says "get me argument 2, when the first argument is 32-bit and I want
> a 64-bit one".

Yeah, but...  You either get to give SYSCALL_DEFINE more than just
the number of arguments (SYSCALL_DEFINE_WDDW) or you need to go
for rather grotty macros to pick that information.  That's pretty
much what I'd tried; it hadn't been fun at all...

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-28 22:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-28 18:38 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 0/3] x86/pti-ish syscall cleanups Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-28 18:38 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 1/3] x86/entry/64: Remove the SYSCALL64 fast path Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-28 19:00   ` [kernel-hardening] " Ingo Molnar
2018-01-30 14:49   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-30 14:50   ` [tip:x86/pti] x86/entry/64: Push extra regs right away tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-28 18:38 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 2/3] x86/asm: Move 'status' from thread_struct to thread_info Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-28 19:02   ` [kernel-hardening] " Ingo Molnar
2018-01-28 19:19   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-30 14:50   ` [tip:x86/pti] " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-28 18:38 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH 3/3] syscalls: Add a bit of documentation to __SYSCALL_DEFINE Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-28 19:15   ` [kernel-hardening] " Linus Torvalds
2018-01-28 20:21     ` Al Viro
2018-01-28 20:42       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-28 22:50         ` Al Viro [this message]
2018-01-29  6:22           ` Al Viro
2018-01-28 19:21   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180128225031.GJ13338@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.