From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:37:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: Mirror arm for unimplemented compat syscalls In-Reply-To: <20180122212026.26262-3-michael.weiser@gmx.de> References: <20180122131851.GA28638@arm.com> <20180122212026.26262-3-michael.weiser@gmx.de> Message-ID: <20180129153730.GA24444@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Michael, On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:20:26PM +0100, Michael Weiser wrote: > Mirror arm behaviour for unimplemented syscalls: Below 2048 return > -ENOSYS. Above 2048 raise SIGILL and print a ratelimited message with > details. dump_instr() is made non-static and added to system_misc.h so > it can be used in compat_arm_syscall(). Also it is synced with the arm > implementation to support thumb instructions. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Weiser > --- > arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 1 + > arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 14 ++++++++++---- > 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h > index 07aa8e3c5630..0f73b6c1ca63 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void hook_debug_fault_code(int nr, int (*fn)(unsigned long, unsigned int, > struct mm_struct; > extern void show_pte(unsigned long addr); > extern void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *); > +extern void dump_instr(const char *lvl, struct pt_regs *regs); > > extern void (*arm_pm_restart)(enum reboot_mode reboot_mode, const char *cmd); > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c > index 8b8bbd3eaa52..3a5b3809b671 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/sys_compat.c > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ > #include > > #include > +#include > #include > > static long > @@ -67,6 +68,7 @@ do_compat_cache_op(unsigned long start, unsigned long end, int flags) > */ > long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs) > { > + siginfo_t info; > unsigned int no = regs->regs[7]; > > switch (no) { > @@ -99,6 +101,31 @@ long compat_arm_syscall(struct pt_regs *regs) > return 0; > > default: > - return -ENOSYS; > + /* > + * Calls 9f00xx..9f07ff are defined to return -ENOSYS > + * if not implemented, rather than raising SIGILL. This > + * way the calling program can gracefully determine whether > + * a feature is supported. > + */ > + if ((no & 0xffff) <= 0x7ff) > + return -ENOSYS; > + break; > } > + > + if (show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited()) { > + pr_err("[%d] %s: arm syscall %d\n", > + task_pid_nr(current), current->comm, no); > + dump_instr("", regs); > + if (user_mode(regs)) > + __show_regs(regs); > + } > + > + info.si_signo = SIGILL; > + info.si_errno = 0; > + info.si_code = ILL_ILLTRP; > + info.si_addr = (void __user *)instruction_pointer(regs) - > + (compat_thumb_mode(regs) ? 2 : 4); > + > + arm64_notify_die("Oops - bad syscall(2)", regs, &info, no); > + return 0; Whilst I think it's worth mirroring the SIGILL behaviour here, I don't think we need to both with the show_unhandled_signals_ratelimited() hunk. It's predicated on CONFI_DEBUG_USER for arch/arm/ anyway, so it's something that can be relied upon but really more of a debug aid that we can live without for now. So I'd suggest simply dropping that hunk and the changes to __dump_instr. Cheers, Will